Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
Geale & Quillin would both beat Barker
Neither would last 12 rounds with him.
Do u watch boxing. Quillin make mince meat o barker and Geale wins a wide decision. Suggesting Barker wins inside the distance is moronic. He is fighting bums and still doesn't have a good KO %. He is a European level fighter and will not win a proper world title. Proksa would be a good test for him
I commend you on your great sense of humour and send my condolences for the absence of any sound boxing judgement.
I presume your British and completely blinded by the limited skills they have and get shown up at world level. Probably one of the fools who gave Hatton a chance against Mayweather and Pacman.

Quillin is faster, stronger,slicker and a better all round fighter then Barker. I see barker being competitive for 4/5 rounds before Quilling gets him on the back foot and starts to dominate.

Geale is stronger and has a better work rate. Barker, you could argue has the better skills, but he won't have the power to keep Geale off him and Geale will break him down and win a UD, perhaps making Barker quit in a late round.