Woods V Johnson predictions (merged)

[Violent Demise]

I know enough of Woods to know he should be 0-2 against Johnson. And answer this bitch, how can the fight be 50/50? In there 2 fights has Woods ever have the upper hand? Has he ever even hurt Johnson? No he hasn't. The scores have been close because of bullshit judging. Not cuz of anything Woods has done. You talk this all nosense of how Woods has gotten so much better. Why? Cuz he has the IBF title? It's a garbage title. Everybody knows it. Only fools like you consider Woods a champion. And lets see if you keep your word and come back when Woods loses easily again.

By that rational if Roy Jones were to fight Bernard Hopkins at this point in time he would win comfortably on points yes?

No of course not, alot has changed in the last few years. Over twenty four rounds Johnson proved the better man, clearly in fight two. Even if Johnson maintains his level of performance it isnt stretching the boundries of possibility to suggest that Woods improvement makes this an even money fight, is it?

By the way Woods is a proper champion, he has fought his eliminators and won it fair and square and now looks to defend it against the toughest on offer, cant ask for more than that.

The time frame between Jones-Hopkins and Woods-Johnson fights is to far apart to compare. And the IBF was stripped from Johnson cuz he decided to fight Antonio Tarver. At the time the best Light Heavyweight out there. I don't care how many eliminators Woods fought (he fought Jason DeLisle for christ's sake) he's still a paper champion.

[Galaxy]

I know enough of Woods to know he should be 0-2 against Johnson. And answer this bitch, how can the fight be 50/50? In there 2 fights has Woods ever have the upper hand? Has he ever even hurt Johnson? No he hasn't. The scores have been close because of bullshit judging. Not cuz of anything Woods has done. You talk this all nosense of how Woods has gotten so much better. Why? Cuz he has the IBF title? It's a garbage title. Everybody knows it. Only fools like you consider Woods a champion. And lets see if you keep your word and come back when Woods loses easily again.

By that rational if Roy Jones were to fight Bernard Hopkins at this point in time he would win comfortably on points yes?

No of course not, alot has changed in the last few years. Over twenty four rounds Johnson proved the better man, clearly in fight two. Even if Johnson maintains his level of performance it isnt stretching the boundries of possibility to suggest that Woods improvement makes this an even money fight, is it?

By the way Woods is a proper champion, he has fought his eliminators and won it fair and square and now looks to defend it against the toughest on offer, cant ask for more than that.

The time frame between Jones-Hopkins and Woods-Johnson fights is to far apart to compare. And the IBF was stripped from Johnson cuz he decided to fight Antonio Tarver. At the time the best Light Heavyweight out there. I don't care how many eliminators Woods fought (he fought Jason DeLisle for christ's sake) he's still a paper champion.

cc bro, Hopkins was/ is the light-heavyweight champion. Woods is a belt holder!!!

[Memphis]

The time frame between Jones-Hopkins and Woods-Johnson fights is to far apart to compare. And the IBF was stripped from Johnson cuz he decided to fight Antonio Tarver. At the time the best Light Heavyweight out there. I don't care how many eliminators Woods fought (he fought Jason DeLisle for christ's sake) he's still a paper champion.

Right, because nothing changes in three years

Please tell me for future reference how long has to pass between fights for it to be of any significance.

[Fenster]

Should be an easy win for Johnson. In reality Johnson should be 2-0 versus Woods. Not1-0-1. I see no reason why Johnson can't beat Woods for a 3rd time.

I don't know. I think that Woods pulled a Corrales and waited for Johnson to be on the slide just like Corrales just did with Casamayor.

Yeah you're probably right cause Corrales took it real easy fighting bums like Freitas and Castillo whilst waiting for Casamayor to deteriorate

No matter what happened before and whoever wins this third fight Woods and Johnson are two of the premier Light Heavyweights in the world and its a good fight to make.

I expect the fight to be very close possibly a split decision which of course means if Woods gets it it'll be on account of corrupt judges, dodgy shitty reffing, ROBBERY, ROBBERY, ROBBERY in the eyes of the "fans."

[TheSilverBoy]

i think johnson is going to beat him he has looked the better in the last few fights and he would have the more confidence going in after beating tarver once and jones jr

i would like woods to win tho

so calzaghe can step up and beat him

[shza]

Johnson UD. And a CC to Violent Demise.

[Violent Demise]

The time frame between Jones-Hopkins and Woods-Johnson fights is to far apart to compare. And the IBF was stripped from Johnson cuz he decided to fight Antonio Tarver. At the time the best Light Heavyweight out there. I don't care how many eliminators Woods fought (he fought Jason DeLisle for christ's sake) he's still a paper champion.

Right, because nothing changes in three years

Please tell me for future reference how long has to pass between fights for it to be of any significance.

I was talking about Hopkins-Jones. If they fight it would be what over a decade since there first fight. How you going to compare that to Johnson-Woods? Sc for not knowing.

[Memphis]

Now you've hurt my feelings

You talk like Johnson and Woods fought last week. Of course Jones and Hopkins fought along time ago, its called an example, an exaggerated one at that.

Have a cool click, they are clearly of some significance to you

[skel1983]

The time frame between Jones-Hopkins and Woods-Johnson fights is to far apart to compare. And the IBF was stripped from Johnson cuz he decided to fight Antonio Tarver. At the time the best Light Heavyweight out there. I don't care how many eliminators Woods fought (he fought Jason DeLisle for christ's sake) he's still a paper champion.

Right, because nothing changes in three years

Please tell me for future reference how long has to pass between fights for it to be of any significance.

I was talking about Hopkins-Jones. If they fight it would be what over a decade since there first fight. How you going to compare that to Johnson-Woods? Sc for not knowing.

Have another Sad Ckick for not comprehending what Memphis was getting at.

[Violent Demise]

Now you've hurt my feelings

You talk like Johnson and Woods fought last week. Of course Jones and Hopkins fought along time ago, its called an example, an exaggerated one at that.

Have a cool click, they are clearly of some significance to you

Jones-Hopkins was beyond exaggeration. Johnson-Woods was 3 years ago, but has Johnson shown any sighs of decline in those 3 years?

[Violent Demise]

The time frame between Jones-Hopkins and Woods-Johnson fights is to far apart to compare. And the IBF was stripped from Johnson cuz he decided to fight Antonio Tarver. At the time the best Light Heavyweight out there. I don't care how many eliminators Woods fought (he fought Jason DeLisle for christ's sake) he's still a paper champion.

Right, because nothing changes in three years

Please tell me for future reference how long has to pass between fights for it to be of any significance.

I was talking about Hopkins-Jones. If they fight it would be what over a decade since there first fight. How you going to compare that to Johnson-Woods? Sc for not knowing.

Have another Sad Ckick for not comprehending what Memphis was getting at.

Memphis himself couldn't comprehend what he was getting at. Comparing Jones-Hopkins and Johnson-Woods makes no sense. Only a fool like you would actually agree with it. Take your sc for kissing a mod's ass.

[Memphis]

Read my first post. Woods has alot more to offer this time around, Johnson doesnt. If there was a gap in fights one and two (clearly more evident in fight two) then Clinton has closed it IMO. Even money fight.

Alot can, and has changed in three years, thats not too difficult to comprehend, is it?