
Originally Posted by
greynotsoold
Hopkins is a credit to boxing. He took the time to learn his trade, and to master it, and he was a consumate professional. Always in shape, always ready to give whatever it took. He had his lapses- the two fights with Jermain Taylor, for example. And I bet he kicks his own ass daily, seeing now how weak Taylor really was.
That said, I believe his longevity is a real result of the dumbing down of boxing. He fights a lot of guys that are boxing dumb. Of course, the same thing was said about Archie Moore in the 1950s, and, given the sudden dearth of club shows and so on, it was probably valid. But the guys Moore fought were leagues above the guys Hopkins has fought, just as Moore was smarter than Hopkins could ever be. Because Moore fought Charley Burley and ezzard Charles and Eddie Booker and Jack chase and the list goes ever on. Hopkins never fought smart guys like that.
He had a bunch of defenses at MW, and that has to be worth something, but it doesn't make him a better fighter than guys that had less. I don't think he beats Hagler or Monzon, or Toney (though neither were as smart as they got later)....Honestly, in head to head matches, I don't know if he'd break my top 30 at that weight. There were some great fighters that never won a title.
Bookmarks