Hearns vs Mayweather & Hagler vs Hopkins

[Mr140]

Think Rays root work was better then Floyds to be honest with you also his combination punching was better as well when he go on the offence. Floyd in his prime pretty much lost to Costillo and his best win is a older Oscar. I have hard time determining what he would do with fights that are in different leagues and are atg as well. The closet thing was Oscar and he in no way dominated him i sure you can look better when you oppents are not as great. Hearns, Duran, Hagler and Benitez were atg and Leonard beat them all i mean i will go look at the flim but i think he was a better fighter in the ring.

[Mr140]

Hearns may have not had the best chin in the world but Mayweather didn't have the power of Leonard or a Hagler either. I mean Mayweather has had a reach advantage in all his fights as well or damn near. Your saying Mayweather is above these guys but his resume doesn't show me he could hang. I mean Castillo pretty much beating him in prime and rematch being really close as well. Then you have Oscar at the tail end of his career who took at least 116 112 against him at worst. I don't see Mayweather out boxing Hearn's because no one ever did and he does not have the attack like Leonard did at welter. Mayweather is a great fighter but i mean his comp is not even as strong as the 90's was above welter. He has caught alot of fighters at the tail end of there careers which was not his fault but it holds him back in think he could out fight a Hearns or a Leonard.