Golovkin v Macklin June 29th

[Beanz]

A Golovki- Sturm/Mundine/Soliman fight would have been a bit better. jmo...

Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez next

So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.

Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.

A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.

FFS... put Murray in there if anything.

OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.

What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?

Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.

Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.

Mundine Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.

Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.

I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.

It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.

Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.

Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.

Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.

Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!


I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.

Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.

And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.

Uhmm...what a brilliantly objective post.