Dempsey was arguably still at his peak I think @Master. He was actually favoured to win both fights at least by the betting stubs. I think the 20 foot ring did him in. Had that ring been a 16 footer history may have been written differently.
Dempsey was arguably still at his peak I think @Master. He was actually favoured to win both fights at least by the betting stubs. I think the 20 foot ring did him in. Had that ring been a 16 footer history may have been written differently.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
They were not that is true but if a younger Dempsey could get his hands on Tunney I am sure he would have finished him off.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Master you forget Tunney almost finished Dempsey if it was more then 10 rounds he be out cold. Also forget that Tunney only fought once before the rematch with Dempsey was ending his career as well. I believe Tunney with his boxing skills and movement would of beat any fighter from 1910's to 1940s. He was way above his time form what i have seen of him his boxing skills were way ahead of the curve. I mean i didn't see anyone that could box and move like him from that early of a time period to be honest with you.
Again I think it had to do with ring size and style. Still had Jack not stood over Tunney and went to the neutral corner immediately he would have that ko win and in that bigger ring.
Ps- Its 3am here and I got a terrible case of insomnia. I may have to put on a Ruiz fight.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks