So explain to me why Hagler, a guy WIDELY considered to be in the top 3 MWs of all time, is so far above Bhop?
Yeah he beat Hearns and Duran... Hearns, a former WW and LMW champ who was fighting for the first time at MW. Duran, a former LW and WW champ fighting at MW for the first time, who immediately went back down in weight after the fight. So I ask you how that's any different than Bhop beating DLH and Trinidad, two GREAT fighters? Trinidad, a guy who had fought a legit top 5 middleweight at the time and DESTROYED him, showing he carried his brutal power up to MW. Oscar, a guy who also had fought at MW prior and won a world title there (albiet on one of the biggest BS decisions in boxing).
So why does Hagler get credit for that, and Bhop gets nothing? That's not mentioning the fact that Hagler lost to another smaller man in Leonard, who was coming back in his first fight after 3 or 4 years.
Who else did Hagler beat that was so beyond Bhop? Mugabi? Another smaller man who went up and dropped back down immediately following the fight. Roldan? Who did he beat to be great? Are we going to say that beating Caveman Lee and Hamsho is more impressive than Antonio Tarver, Winky Wright, or Pavlik?
Bookmarks