Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Scott22 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
What exactly has Schellenberger done in the past that makes him bias towards the WBC? Don't do like the other clown and get scared by the facts. Answer the question.


  • Dec. 15, 2000 - Dingaan Thobela vs. Dave Hilton - Schellenberger was the only judge to rule in favor of Thobela who lost his WBC middleweight title via split decision. Julie Lederman 115-113, Barbara Perez 117-111, Shellenberger 113-115.


Next question...
Are you fucking kidding me?

So let me get this straight. Schellenberger ruled in favor of Stevie Johnson a black fighter instead of Cesar Bazan the Mexican fighter. And that's suppose to prove that he's Sulaiman boy? If Sulaiman is bias towards Mexcian fighters than why the fuck did Schellenberger have the black fighter winning?

Thobela is from South Africa and Hilton is Canadien. Him thinking Thobela won proves he's Sulaiman boy? How?
One thing about the Johnson-Bazan fight is many people thing Johnson actually deserved it. Really Schellenberger is the one who actually had it right.
Thank you. Finally some one who actually saw the fight instead of just commenting on something they never seen. Explain to me how Schellenberger scoring the fight for Johnson proves he's bias toward Mexican fighters?
It doesn't. I mean I don't know. LOL. All Im saying is he had the right guy winning.