for those who missed it
Austin Trout vs Saul ‘CANELO’ Alvarez | SoSoBoxing.com | Worlds Largest Boxing Video Site
Close fight. Always thought Canelo would struggle to outpoint someone taller with a longer reach who boxes with the style that Trout has. A bit gutted Alvarez could not capitalise on his moments of success and remove any doubt from the haters. You have to give Trout some credit for making it so awkward but he hit air quite a lot and never seemed intent on stopping the red headed youngster. A no win situation for Alvarez, if it had been a draw or a close loss he may have been afforded more kudos. You can make a good case for Trout winning, a draw or a close points win for Alvarez. This was not a robbery but the wide score cards, the WBC and Suialimans B/S open scoring etc in Trouts homestate leaves the bitter taste of Strichnin in the mouth. I want let that poison close my eyes to the ability of Canelo though. The kid can dig, is hard to hit and has a lot of potential. In a perfect world they would rematch in Vegas, but Trout would still lose. The better fighter won, IMO.
Open scoring is a joke. I had the fight 116-113 but Canelo took over 2nd half of fight only losing one of last 6.
118-109 was a joke, but if Alvarez fights Mayweather he better get used to that scorecard! He has no chance.
Oh, it's VD's pet lap dog.
You know why it's usually quiet from your end when the threads shitting all over Sulaiman and his Mexican Mafia are rolling in? Because you guys know it all to be true. And it's hard to defend the indefensible.
Yeah... we're in a pretty bad slump right now. But at least I'm not reduced to cheering for crooked organizations, or scumbag fighters who cheat to get where they're at.
You rather cheer for quitters who enjoy sharing there bed with other men instead.
To show how lame and pridictable you are, I'm sure you're gonna take this post as some kind of attack. But that's just you being lame and pridictable like always. Cuz it's not an attack. You are a big Cotto fan right (don't deny him now)? Of course you are. So my post is not an attack. It's a fact
Oh you're back. I noticed you crawled back into your hole in the wall after I responded to your "quitter" quip with a shot you probably didn't like. So let me get this straight..... I cheer for "quitters who enjoy sharing their (not "there" moron) bed with other men"...... while you cheer for crossdressing, fishnet-wearing quitters, as well as pink panties wearing little cheaters.
All things considered, I'd rather be in my shoes.
But good of you to drop by for another beating.
But I'm afraid our time is up for today, Ghetto Man.
Nice ridiculing you as always.![]()
Ffs
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks