Re: Tyson Fury vs. Malik Scott ?

Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al

Originally Posted by
Vendettos

Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al

Originally Posted by
Vendettos

Originally Posted by
Hulk

Originally Posted by
Vendettos
Fury by stoppage or UD.
Fury has fought Chisora, Kevin Johnson, and Cunningham and won comfortably ( excluding knockdown).
Malik has only fought 2 decent fighters and failed against the last one by getting that draw.
Malik has the skill but nowhere near the power to trouble Fury. Fury is hard to beat when he has no worries about power and can just walk you down!
That's bullshit and you know it. He clearly CLEARLY dominated that fight against the hard hitting Russian, who is shorter, but a better puncher and more talented than Fury.
Everything else you said makes sense though. Fair enough. I will add that I don't think Fury could just walk thru Scott's punches, but he would have the power advantage for sure.
He left it up to the judges, so a draw was his own fault.
I agee Fury wouldn't just walk through Scott's punches, but he would fight without fear,
as 6'5 fighters don't really throw overhands rights and Scott certainly doesn't.
Lennox Lewis never threw an overhand right ?
Riddick Bowe didnt either ?
I know, I made sure the sentence didn't exclude everyone.
Tbh the sentence didn't really deserve a full post and quote. Shame on you.
explain what you mean then dude , dont turn into ROSS and contradict yourself all the time

Not at all.
My thoughts are this. Watching big heavyweights recently I don't see very many overhand rights being thrown, granted that there are some big heavyweights that have done it regularly.
Cruisers like Cunningham use it against bigger fighters like he did v Fury.
Although I know my knowledge is pretty good on boxing and heavyweights in particular, I have never claimed to be the the Wikipedia of boxing information.
And if I'm talking shit correct me. But perspective is subjective.
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
Bookmarks