Tyson Fury vs. Malik Scott ?

[palmerq]

malik scott better hurry up and get on with it :S he is pretty old now and has wasted so many years ..... his performance v glazhkov, who i think is very good, shows he certainly has a fair amount of real talent... maybe he has left it too late though

[ykdadamaja]

Fury by a MD...

[Spicoli]

I think its a stretch to say Scott 'dominated' Glazkov in any fashion, big time styles clash. I had Glaz on more effective punching and body work by about 2,3 points.

Fury is a walking trivia question living on a fast ticking 15 minutes of fame, sorry but thats what I see. I just dont know if Scott is offense minded and willing enough to set his feet and punch between his predictable delivery to keep that mass and maul from wearing his legs down.

"He celebrated in the ring following a DOMINATING 10 round performance over Vyacheslav Glazkov, perhaps thinking he'd finally shed the eight round fighter label. But then the judges intervened and crashed the party with their verdict."

"Scott cleanly out-boxed, outclassed and out smarted the 2008 super heavyweight bronze medalist from the Ukraine, but had to settle for a draw...."

"Scott displayd an excellent jab and looked the part of a legitimate heavyweight contender. But on this night, he was no match for the judges."

-
Ring Magazine (June 2013)

"Adrien Broner #5 P4P in the world"....Ring Magazine


You have a 90% backfoot boxer with a fine jab with a 90% pressure guy landing heavier shots..it was a draw ffs. It was not a robbery.

[superheavyrhun]

i just don't see malik scott having the tools to trouble tyson fury. fury's big weakness is against punchers, and he'd just walk into range and brawl his way to a win on a better workrate.

i hoped i'd seen the last of scott when he disappeared a few years ago, but i don't see him troubling the title scene.

[Beanz]

Tyson fury's big weakness is against punchers, boxers, people the same size as him, people who are smaller and Karaoke.

[Hulk]

I think its a stretch to say Scott 'dominated' Glazkov in any fashion, big time styles clash. I had Glaz on more effective punching and body work by about 2,3 points.

Fury is a walking trivia question living on a fast ticking 15 minutes of fame, sorry but thats what I see. I just dont know if Scott is offense minded and willing enough to set his feet and punch between his predictable delivery to keep that mass and maul from wearing his legs down.

"He celebrated in the ring following a DOMINATING 10 round performance over Vyacheslav Glazkov, perhaps thinking he'd finally shed the eight round fighter label. But then the judges intervened and crashed the party with their verdict."

"Scott cleanly out-boxed, outclassed and out smarted the 2008 super heavyweight bronze medalist from the Ukraine, but had to settle for a draw...."

"Scott displayd an excellent jab and looked the part of a legitimate heavyweight contender. But on this night, he was no match for the judges."

-
Ring Magazine (June 2013)

"Adrien Broner #5 P4P in the world"....Ring Magazine


You have a 90% backfoot boxer with a fine jab with a 90% pressure guy landing heavier shots..it was a draw ffs. It was not a robbery.

And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China ?

Rating Broner too highly in the mythical, hypothetical P4P makes ALL material in Ring Magazine null and void ?

It wasn't even close to a draw. One guy barely threw any punches and was soundly outboxed by the other guy.

[Spicoli]

I think its a stretch to say Scott 'dominated' Glazkov in any fashion, big time styles clash. I had Glaz on more effective punching and body work by about 2,3 points.

Fury is a walking trivia question living on a fast ticking 15 minutes of fame, sorry but thats what I see. I just dont know if Scott is offense minded and willing enough to set his feet and punch between his predictable delivery to keep that mass and maul from wearing his legs down.

"He celebrated in the ring following a DOMINATING 10 round performance over Vyacheslav Glazkov, perhaps thinking he'd finally shed the eight round fighter label. But then the judges intervened and crashed the party with their verdict."

"Scott cleanly out-boxed, outclassed and out smarted the 2008 super heavyweight bronze medalist from the Ukraine, but had to settle for a draw...."

"Scott displayd an excellent jab and looked the part of a legitimate heavyweight contender. But on this night, he was no match for the judges."

-
Ring Magazine (June 2013)

"Adrien Broner #5 P4P in the world"....Ring Magazine


You have a 90% backfoot boxer with a fine jab with a 90% pressure guy landing heavier shots..it was a draw ffs. It was not a robbery.

And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China ?

Rating Broner too highly in the mythical, hypothetical P4P makes ALL material in Ring Magazine null and void ?

It wasn't even close to a draw. One guy barely threw any punches and was soundly outboxed by the other guy.

It means everyone has an opinion, and just because its called The Bible of boxing doesn't mean its own is sacred and fact. You and I saw different fights on the same night. One guy was effected and moved by the others punches and he looked very prevent defense minded I thought. He almost talked as much shit during the fight as he did afterwards.

[Hulk]

I think its a stretch to say Scott 'dominated' Glazkov in any fashion, big time styles clash. I had Glaz on more effective punching and body work by about 2,3 points.

Fury is a walking trivia question living on a fast ticking 15 minutes of fame, sorry but thats what I see. I just dont know if Scott is offense minded and willing enough to set his feet and punch between his predictable delivery to keep that mass and maul from wearing his legs down.

"He celebrated in the ring following a DOMINATING 10 round performance over Vyacheslav Glazkov, perhaps thinking he'd finally shed the eight round fighter label. But then the judges intervened and crashed the party with their verdict."

"Scott cleanly out-boxed, outclassed and out smarted the 2008 super heavyweight bronze medalist from the Ukraine, but had to settle for a draw...."

"Scott displayd an excellent jab and looked the part of a legitimate heavyweight contender. But on this night, he was no match for the judges."

-
Ring Magazine (June 2013)

"Adrien Broner #5 P4P in the world"....Ring Magazine


You have a 90% backfoot boxer with a fine jab with a 90% pressure guy landing heavier shots..it was a draw ffs. It was not a robbery.

And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China ?

Rating Broner too highly in the mythical, hypothetical P4P makes ALL material in Ring Magazine null and void ?

It wasn't even close to a draw. One guy barely threw any punches and was soundly outboxed by the other guy.

It means everyone has an opinion, and just because its called The Bible of boxing doesn't mean its own is sacred and fact. You and I saw different fights on the same night. One guy was effected and moved by the others punches and he looked very prevent defense minded I thought. He almost talked as much shit during the fight as he did afterwards.

We certainly did see different fights. I was simply using Ring magazine to support my statement and reinforce that the majority of folks did see a dominating performance by Malik Scott.

He is a shit talker, but then again so is Tyson Fury. Fury more so I feel and certainly more ignorant with his boasts of being able to defeat UFC heavyweight Cain Velasquez and other such outlandish nonsense he doesn't even believe.

[Spicoli]

I think its a stretch to say Scott 'dominated' Glazkov in any fashion, big time styles clash. I had Glaz on more effective punching and body work by about 2,3 points.

Fury is a walking trivia question living on a fast ticking 15 minutes of fame, sorry but thats what I see. I just dont know if Scott is offense minded and willing enough to set his feet and punch between his predictable delivery to keep that mass and maul from wearing his legs down.

"He celebrated in the ring following a DOMINATING 10 round performance over Vyacheslav Glazkov, perhaps thinking he'd finally shed the eight round fighter label. But then the judges intervened and crashed the party with their verdict."

"Scott cleanly out-boxed, outclassed and out smarted the 2008 super heavyweight bronze medalist from the Ukraine, but had to settle for a draw...."

"Scott displayd an excellent jab and looked the part of a legitimate heavyweight contender. But on this night, he was no match for the judges."

-
Ring Magazine (June 2013)

"Adrien Broner #5 P4P in the world"....Ring Magazine


You have a 90% backfoot boxer with a fine jab with a 90% pressure guy landing heavier shots..it was a draw ffs. It was not a robbery.

And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China ?

Rating Broner too highly in the mythical, hypothetical P4P makes ALL material in Ring Magazine null and void ?

It wasn't even close to a draw. One guy barely threw any punches and was soundly outboxed by the other guy.

It means everyone has an opinion, and just because its called The Bible of boxing doesn't mean its own is sacred and fact. You and I saw different fights on the same night. One guy was effected and moved by the others punches and he looked very prevent defense minded I thought. He almost talked as much shit during the fight as he did afterwards.

We certainly did see different fights. I was simply using Ring magazine to support my statement and reinforce that the majority of folks did see a dominating performance by Malik Scott.

He is a shit talker, but then again so is Tyson Fury. Fury more so I feel and certainly more ignorant with his boasts of being able to defeat UFC heavyweight Cain Velasquez and other such outlandish nonsense he doesn't even believe.

I hear you bud. At the end of the day its their opinion I just think dominating is way off the mark and in line with BJ Flores nuthuggery. Hey, huge difference between Scott and Fury shit talk is Scott is 10 times the skilled boxer. 4 yrs off is massive though. I'd like to see more sit sown and fire from Scott before he approaches a out of tune but all in your face behemoth in Fury.

[Hulk]

I think its a stretch to say Scott 'dominated' Glazkov in any fashion, big time styles clash. I had Glaz on more effective punching and body work by about 2,3 points.

Fury is a walking trivia question living on a fast ticking 15 minutes of fame, sorry but thats what I see. I just dont know if Scott is offense minded and willing enough to set his feet and punch between his predictable delivery to keep that mass and maul from wearing his legs down.

"He celebrated in the ring following a DOMINATING 10 round performance over Vyacheslav Glazkov, perhaps thinking he'd finally shed the eight round fighter label. But then the judges intervened and crashed the party with their verdict."

"Scott cleanly out-boxed, outclassed and out smarted the 2008 super heavyweight bronze medalist from the Ukraine, but had to settle for a draw...."

"Scott displayd an excellent jab and looked the part of a legitimate heavyweight contender. But on this night, he was no match for the judges."

-
Ring Magazine (June 2013)

"Adrien Broner #5 P4P in the world"....Ring Magazine


You have a 90% backfoot boxer with a fine jab with a 90% pressure guy landing heavier shots..it was a draw ffs. It was not a robbery.

And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China ?

Rating Broner too highly in the mythical, hypothetical P4P makes ALL material in Ring Magazine null and void ?

It wasn't even close to a draw. One guy barely threw any punches and was soundly outboxed by the other guy.

It means everyone has an opinion, and just because its called The Bible of boxing doesn't mean its own is sacred and fact. You and I saw different fights on the same night. One guy was effected and moved by the others punches and he looked very prevent defense minded I thought. He almost talked as much shit during the fight as he did afterwards.

We certainly did see different fights. I was simply using Ring magazine to support my statement and reinforce that the majority of folks did see a dominating performance by Malik Scott.

He is a shit talker, but then again so is Tyson Fury. Fury more so I feel and certainly more ignorant with his boasts of being able to defeat UFC heavyweight Cain Velasquez and other such outlandish nonsense he doesn't even believe.

I hear you bud. At the end of the day its their opinion I just think dominating is way off the mark and in line with BJ Flores nuthuggery. Hey, huge difference between Scott and Fury shit talk is Scott is 10 times the skilled boxer. 4 yrs off is massive though. I'd like to see more sit sown and fire from Scott before he approaches a out of tune but all in your face behemoth in Fury.

We can agree to disagree on Scott's last fight, but we can both agree BJ Flores is an extremely bias commentator. The way he called the Eddie Chambers vs. Adamek fight was terrible.