Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 71

Thread: Can froch now legitimately claim to be remembered as better than Calzaghe

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can froch now legitimately claim to be remembered as better than Calzaghe

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post

    Just because Froch gets hit more often than Calzaghe doesnt make him tougher. Froch did get dropped by Taylor, a middle weight who couldnt drop welter weight Spinks or light middle Ouma.

    Froch hasnt really fought any noted big punchers other than Kessler.

    Id like to see how Froch deals with Bika
    So I assume that Froch-Kessler II is the first Froch fight you've ever seen then?
    Iv seen all his fights, I think, from when he turned pro. The only people you would have said were dangerous punchers at super middle when Froch fought them were Bute and Kessler.

    I agree, Froch is tough but to say hes tougher than Joe is daft. Taking punches doesnt equal tough. Froch didnt have it in himself to turn up the pressure in the first fight with Kessler because he likes to fight at his pace in his comfort zone. Like Abraham there is a myth that these kinds of fighters have good stamina and come on in the late rounds but when you look at their work rate its consistant and low. the oponent is ususally doing the working and winning until they tire but against the top boys it doesnt work like that, they will be there with you and against Calzaghe he would never have had the luxury of a tiring fighter in front of him.

    He learned he had to do it in the rematch but I didnt see him as a clear winner again. I saw it a draw. Kesslers work in those mid rounds to 11th outshone what Froch was trying to do and I think it earnt Kessler a draw. I cant remember the exact rounds but between 4 and 11 Kessler to me wan the majority.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,156
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can froch now legitimately claim to be remembered as better than Calzaghe

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post

    Just because Froch gets hit more often than Calzaghe doesnt make him tougher. Froch did get dropped by Taylor, a middle weight who couldnt drop welter weight Spinks or light middle Ouma.

    Froch hasnt really fought any noted big punchers other than Kessler.

    Id like to see how Froch deals with Bika
    So I assume that Froch-Kessler II is the first Froch fight you've ever seen then?
    Iv seen all his fights, I think, from when he turned pro. The only people you would have said were dangerous punchers at super middle when Froch fought them were Bute and Kessler.

    I agree, Froch is tough but to say hes tougher than Joe is daft. Taking punches doesnt equal tough. Froch didnt have it in himself to turn up the pressure in the first fight with Kessler because he likes to fight at his pace in his comfort zone. Like Abraham there is a myth that these kinds of fighters have good stamina and come on in the late rounds but when you look at their work rate its consistant and low. the oponent is ususally doing the working and winning until they tire but against the top boys it doesnt work like that, they will be there with you and against Calzaghe he would never have had the luxury of a tiring fighter in front of him.

    He learned he had to do it in the rematch but I didnt see him as a clear winner again. I saw it a draw. Kesslers work in those mid rounds to 11th outshone what Froch was trying to do and I think it earnt Kessler a draw. I cant remember the exact rounds but between 4 and 11 Kessler to me wan the majority.

    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,772
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can froch now legitimately claim to be remembered as better than Calzaghe

    Joe was the better fighter and was undisputed champ. Carl is not.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Froch vs calzaghe
    By Dropanuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-09-2011, 06:29 PM
  2. Froch vs Calzaghe
    By feeney in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 11:47 AM
  3. Has Winky Wright only lost 1 fight legitimately
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 01:27 AM
  4. IS IT GOOD OR BAD TO HAVE A LEGITIMATELY SUPERRIOR KNUCKLE?
    By SalTheButcher in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-23-2006, 01:44 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-06-2006, 10:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing