The weights might well be capped everywhere else but heavy BUT only on the scales. There are fighters drying out to weigh in and are coming in 20lbs heavier at welter. That is a bigger percentage of body weight than 20lbs for a big fat heavy weight.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Which British boxer do you have more respect for: Froch or Haye?
The weights might well be capped everywhere else but heavy BUT only on the scales. There are fighters drying out to weigh in and are coming in 20lbs heavier at welter. That is a bigger percentage of body weight than 20lbs for a big fat heavy weight.
Consistent are the dead
Array
Re: Which British boxer do you have more respect for: Froch or Haye?
David Haye 217lbs v Valuev 310lbs.
93lbs weight advantage.
Show me that at any other weight than heavy bud.
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
Re: Which British boxer do you have more respect for: Froch or Haye?
Valuev was garbage...shouldn't even have been holding the title when that fight happened. Valuev flat out refused to fight Wladimir or Vitali, he was just like John Ruiz he wanted nothing to do with the actual kings of the heavyweight ring.Originally Posted by Vendettos
Froch doesn't have to do a whole bunch of trash talking, Haye does because of how little he offers in the ring. ***GASP*** Yes look at Haye's style, it's 1 big punch at a time, yes the guy is skilled and he COULD make something of himself at the heavyweight division but he doesn't want to get hit, he doesn't want to do the work to set up his punches, and he loves the life of a sports star not the dedication and hard work it takes to be a sports star.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks