Who has Broner fought that Malignaggi wouldn't have beaten?

[Vendettos]

Well I'm certainly not calling him the "next Mayweather," but he does look very talented.

He is only 23. If he lives up to the hype, and shows the same talent up in class, I'm sure he'll have lots of big names on his record over the next few years.

I have no doubt.

Look it's not that I don't like him, even if he is a proper bellend, I tend to ignore a boxers personal life, as I don't watch for the drama of his own issues.

That's why I can ignore Tyson being a rapist, or Valero being a murderer.

I just find it ridiculous that a forum full of boxing fans, are so 1 dimensional in thought processing. Nothing to me says that Broner is the favorite.

[Fenster]

Well I'm certainly not calling him the "next Mayweather," but he does look very talented.

He is only 23. If he lives up to the hype, and shows the same talent up in class, I'm sure he'll have lots of big names on his record over the next few years.

I have no doubt.

Look it's not that I don't like him, even if he is a proper bellend, I tend to ignore a boxers personal life, as I don't watch for the drama of his own issues.

That's why I can ignore Tyson being a rapist, or Valero being a murderer.

I just find it ridiculous that a forum full of boxing fans, are so 1 dimensional in thought processing. Nothing to me says that Broner is the favorite.

Err... what? One dimensional thinking? The fight is between an unbeaten super talented 23-year-old, being groomed for stardom, against a powderpuff punching borderline veteran that has taken a sick beating everytime he's gone into "elite" level.

1. Paulie has zero chance of winning by KO.
2. Paulie has zero chance of getting it on the cards (even if it's close).
3. If Paulie had a chance the fight wouldn't even be happening. They are basically stealing a belt from the weakest title holder at 147.

If you think Paulie is the favourite, and you trust your judgement, you have the opportunity to win an absolute FORTUNE!!! Good luck mate.