Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
Paulie is quick and slick, with a very fast jab, not farfetched that with Broners plod forward style that Paul can pick him off for 12 rounds.

Nothing he has done warrants the massive gap in favoritism I this fight.

Someone said 7/1 and nothing has me sold on Broner enough to make me even consider that as fair.

Paulie MD
I'll argue this point. Paulie is quick, but Broner is quicker IMO. Also, Paulie isn't slick. He fights with a slick style, but he is far too easy to hit to be referred to as slick. He is tough, which is why he gets away with it, but Paulie is hardly a Mayweather. I'll happily sig bet this one if you want, but I see no way Paulie comes out with a win is this one. I just think Broner has the edge in speed, power and strength. Paulie has better footwork, but all the shit they've talked in the build up to this fight will mean he won't want to run as much.
You're on.
brave man

its good to stick your neck out like that sometimes

One hope paulie has is that his size is a big advantage, i havent seen them stood next to each other so i dont know if there is any significant differrence, Paulie has fought big hitters in divisions north of broner tho so perhaps broners power wont be that significant

think what you like about gavin rees, he might not be top end world class but one thing is he is very tough, i havent ever seen him in any kind of trouble before appart from against kotelnik and in that fight he took so much punishment over 10 or 11 rounds or what ever it was he was just knackered, broner hurt him badly every time he made contact
Yeah people will say "Gavin Rees is shit" but he's never been outclassed like that. Broner made him look like a complete mug - which was down to Broner's class not Rees "shitness"