Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Who wins this LW clash?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 90

Thread: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    998
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    And you would be WAY out on a limb re: Robinson's record.
    Ok well let's make a list of his toughest opponents. I'll just put the guys I know, you can add some if you feel I missed somebody or if I wrongly included someone.

    Jake Lamotta
    Henry Armstong
    Kid Galivan
    Bobo Olsen
    Randy Turpin
    Rocky Graziano
    Joey Maxim
    Carmen Basilio
    Gene Fulmer

    There's 9 guys I know are considered great, or at least solid fighters. It's possible I skipped over a name, but his other opponents I know nothing about.

    I'll give him credit for 3 Lamotta fights (that's 12), two Gene Fulmer fights (that's 13), two Turpin's fights (14) and two Basilio fights (15). So by my calculations (which could change), I have Robinson fighting 15 legit fights out of 200 total. That's 7.5% of his fights.

    That's based on how people judge records now. For instance, I only credited 3 Lamotta fights because nobody would get credit for beating the same guy 5 full times. If Floyd fought and beat Cotto another 4 times, would people care?
    Langford fought Wills about 20 times not because he wanted to but because he had to. Burley and the rest of Murderers row fought each other about 10 times each. Not because they wanted to but because they had to. They fought to survive. It does not take away how good they were. Nobody was making 40 million a fight and taking 2 years off in between. Robinson fought these guys more then once because they remained at the top of the food chain and kept getting in line.There was no other belt to be had. I do think tbh that Robinson overlooked the Murderers Row and only fought Wade after he had been retired for two years. I'm sure that money which runs the show today once Robinson was at the top had something to do with it. Of course there are exceptions like two guys not being able to get their ducks in a row for 50 million a piece while the world blames just about everybody else. Fighting people multiple times today wont wash because we live in an instant gratification society. Boxing in many ways resembles a drive through fast food joint. And people change those because somebody forgot to put ketchup in the bag. You lose once today and a certain segment of the boxing viewership
    throws you to the wolves. Considering the sport, that in and of itself is disturbing. People lost more in past eras because they fought once every two weeks with many receiving the call the night before. That shit was common place. Its why guys that go 128-1-2 with 84 knockouts got noticed. Of course the 85 and 0 as an amateur with over 40 first round knockouts didn't hurt.

    Robinson fought 18 world champions and beat 12 hall of famers in an era of 1 champion per division not 10.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    McAllen, Texas?
    Posts
    5,504
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    You forgot a few...Holly Mims, Aaron Wade, Rocky Castellani, Ralph Dupas, Bobo Olson, Jose Basora, Charlie Fusari, Steve Belloise, Kid Gavilan, Bernard Docusen, Tommy Bell, Sammy Angott, Henry Armstrong, Fritzie Zivic, and Marty Servo.
    He fought Izzy Janazzo a whole bunch of times, and Jannazzo had a final record of 63(8 kos)-45 (stopped 6 times, three by Robinson, one in his last fight), which isn't much. Until you look at his record and the quality of guys he was fighting, many of them several times, and losing close fights to and you can tell that he could fight more than a little bit.
    Look at Robinson's record and how early on he was fighting guys like Angott and Zivic and Servo and you can see he wasn't ever taking easy fights.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    You forgot a few...Holly Mims, Aaron Wade, Rocky Castellani, Ralph Dupas, Bobo Olson, Jose Basora, Charlie Fusari, Steve Belloise, Kid Gavilan, Bernard Docusen, Tommy Bell, Sammy Angott, Henry Armstrong, Fritzie Zivic, and Marty Servo.
    He fought Izzy Janazzo a whole bunch of times, and Jannazzo had a final record of 63(8 kos)-45 (stopped 6 times, three by Robinson, one in his last fight), which isn't much. Until you look at his record and the quality of guys he was fighting, many of them several times, and losing close fights to and you can tell that he could fight more than a little bit.
    Look at Robinson's record and how early on he was fighting guys like Angott and Zivic and Servo and you can see he wasn't ever taking easy fights.
    Ok I'll take your word for it and add the 10 extra guys I never mentioned (I have to question how good a 63-45 record fighter is but ok).

    Thats 25 legit fights out of 200, which is up to 12.5%.

    Lets take a look at a modern great, Floyd Mayweather.

    Genaro Hernandez
    Angel Manfredy
    Diego Corrales
    Jesus Chavez
    Jose Luis Castillo twice
    Arturo Gatti (if Jannazzo is added, surely we can add Gatti)
    Sharmba Mitchell (Manny Stewart picked Sharmba to beat Floyd)
    Zab Judah
    De La Hoya
    Ricky Hatton
    Juan Manuel Marquez
    Shane Mosley
    Cotto
    Alvarez (coming up)

    That's being less than generous, leaving out a host of tough champs he fought like Ortiz, Guerrero, ect. You can tell me if you think any of these guys shouldn't be included. I put Sharmba in there mainly on the basis of Stewart's prediction so he can go.

    But as it stands now, that's 33% for Floyd (so roughly 1/3) and 10 less than SRR, which is pretty surprising considering Floyd has less than 1/4th the number of fights that SRR had.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    I honestly think there was a lot higher level of competition back in the SRR era than there is now. There were more professional fighters in New York than there are registered in the entire world today and they were literally coming from hunger. No crybabies quitting fights because they got a booboo on their eye or at least nobody anywhere near world level.

    Give those old timers modern nutrition and training and you could count the number of modern-day guys who could hang with them without having to take your shoes and socks off.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1336
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    I honestly think there was a lot higher level of competition back in the SRR era than there is now. There were more professional fighters in New York than there are registered in the entire world today and they were literally coming from hunger. No crybabies quitting fights because they got a booboo on their eye or at least nobody anywhere near world level.

    Give those old timers modern nutrition and training and you could count the number of modern-day guys who could hang with them without having to take your shoes and socks off.

    So on one hand, you can attribute a guy's toughness to coming from hunger, and at the same time "give him modern nutrition and training" and he'd be a better fighter? I think a certain measure of both is always neccesary to produce a top fighter in any era, this arguement really doesn't work imo.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    I honestly think there was a lot higher level of competition back in the SRR era than there is now. There were more professional fighters in New York than there are registered in the entire world today and they were literally coming from hunger. No crybabies quitting fights because they got a booboo on their eye or at least nobody anywhere near world level.

    Give those old timers modern nutrition and training and you could count the number of modern-day guys who could hang with them without having to take your shoes and socks off.
    Meh I think that's a "rose-colored glasses" view of it if I ever heard one.

    I don't buy the thought that they were so much tougher back then, either. There are cowards and warriors from every generation. A few weeks ago I watched Dennis Lebedev plod forward with the most fucked up facial injuries I've ever seen in a boxing ring.
    A warrior's heart is something you're born with, and there are still tons of boxers today who came from absolutely nothing with the hunger to make something of themselves.

    We hear all this hyperbole about the old school guys, but when you put that aside and actually watch a guy like Bobo Olsen, Gene Fullmer, Carmen Basilio... they were nothing special. These guys weren't the omnipotent demigods that boxing "experts" would have us believe. It's all about context.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    And Robinson quit against Maxim. I know people will say "ohh it was hot" "oh he had to carry Maxim's weight". That's true. But he was still conscious, he could still get up, he chose not to.

    These guys are still human after all!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,315
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    And Robinson quit against Maxim. I know people will say "ohh it was hot" "oh he had to carry Maxim's weight". That's true. But he was still conscious, he could still get up, he chose not to.

    These guys are still human after all!
    The ref could not finish the fight, that is how how it was dipstick.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    983
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Duran vs Whitaker, prime vs prime at LW

    And Robinson quit against Maxim. I know people will say "ohh it was hot" "oh he had to carry Maxim's weight". That's true. But he was still conscious, he could still get up, he chose not to.

    These guys are still human after all!
    You're just being a f*<kin' idiot with this bull$#!t here. I try to stay away from being rude, but when someone makes an idiotic statement like this, ya can't sugar-coat it...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 06-26-2013, 04:05 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-18-2007, 04:14 AM
  3. Prime Whitaker vs Mayweather.
    By IronDanLaw in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-16-2006, 01:30 AM
  4. Debate? A prime Whitaker Vs A prime Duran
    By Bookkeeper in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-10-2006, 05:36 PM
  5. Debate? A prime De La Hoya Vs A prime Duran at 147
    By Bookkeeper in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-10-2006, 06:36 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing