Re: Cotto Vs Urkal ...for hatton's vacant WBA Welter belt

Originally Posted by
wacko3205

Originally Posted by
Violent Demise

Originally Posted by
wacko3205

Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Cotto-Urkal is just as bad of a fight as Hatton-Urango.
Puh-leeze!
Atleast Urkal has fought a live body or two on his way up & he's defended his title a few times to boot.
Urango was gifted his title & he hasn't fought a live body other than Ben Rabah & we all saw that bullshit robbery.
It's nowhere near as bad. Cotto's fighting something other than a hype machine.

What title has Urkal defended? He's never been champion, before.
European EBU title babe.
Won it, defended it, if I am not mistaken...he still has it...either that or he vacated it for a defense against someone...I can't remember who.
Also...just checked boxrec to be sure...at Light Welter he was also a belt holder & he had & defended the WBC International Light Welterweight title on top of defending the European (EBU) Light Welterweight Title.
Currently...they show that he is titleless stateside in the U.S.
Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!
Bookmarks