Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    810
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    At 1999 Pacquiao had been knocked out early.

    He went 13 years without it happening again, but he is knockoutable, but managed 13 years to defend.

    I don't see him getting knocked out again.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    The Marquez KO was as bad as they come. It was Hatton, Williams, or Jones Jr. bad. I agree that Pac was looking pretty good prior to that and Marquez was getting busted up and in the previous 2 rounds he was getting pretty mashed facially but then he found the keys to the mansion. The timed punch that potentially ends careers.

    People give the example of Duran who came back from a bad KO, but most of the time fighters are not the same. Also, Pac in his next fight will have been out a year and his speed is the key. He is only going to get tagged more and once your brain has experienced being knocked out cold like that, I think it is something that can only deteriorate a fighters resistance. You get tagged hard again and the neurons in the brain start to hyperventilate. The brain probably doesn't enjoy it very much.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1357
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Marquez didn't take 42 rounds to figure him out, he took 6, cause he dominated him from the 6th round onward of their first fight, and continued doing so since, IMO Pacquiao is 4-0 against JMM or at the very least 0-3-1 against Marquez, the KO is just a punctuation on how much better JMM is than Manny, people can't find a valid excuse for the loss, he wasn't the older fighter, both men have climbed up in weight, both have been in wars, roughly same number of fights, so enough with the excuses for Manny, he miscalculated trying to put the cards in his favor, and well it backfired and he got whooped for the 2nd consecutive year

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1369
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    The Bradley one wasn't that bad because it was widely regarded as a bad decision.

    But it's ALWAYS terrible to get KTFO by a rival. And for people that feel JMM was robbed in some of those fights (personally I believe JMM won the 1st and 3rd fight, with Pac winning the 2nd by a close margin), the huge KO was a confirmation that JMM was the better fighter.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    810
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Fights like the first 3 are close and it's who refs that counts.

    All 3 fights and they're punch stats said Pacquiao won.

    I'm not a huge Pacquiao fan, but I want to see him vs mayweather, so he needs at least 2 good wins.

    JMM won't rematch him I bet, which is shocking because Pacquiao rematched him 3 times.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    964
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Fights like the first 3 are close and it's who refs that counts.

    All 3 fights and they're punch stats said Pacquiao won.

    I'm not a huge Pacquiao fan, but I want to see him vs mayweather, so he needs at least 2 good wins.

    JMM won't rematch him I bet, which is shocking because Pacquiao rematched him 3 times.
    i didnt think the fights with JMM were bad decisions, the last one he won there was uproar but i thought he won

    pac was fighting very regularly at the very top level and usually against much bigger fighters, he looked unbeatable at one point, but he's gone off the boil a bit which is acceptable considering

    people talk about carl frochs run of fights, which is amazing, pacs is much better especially considering the weights he moved up through
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1357
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Fights like the first 3 are close and it's who refs that counts.

    All 3 fights and they're punch stats said Pacquiao won.

    I'm not a huge Pacquiao fan, but I want to see him vs mayweather, so he needs at least 2 good wins.

    JMM won't rematch him I bet, which is shocking because Pacquiao rematched him 3 times.
    punch stats don't mean shit, and Pacquiao only rematched Marquez when it was a last resort cause he had run out of other options or he felt that it was beneficial to him, it's a well known FACT that Marquez had to chase him way too long to get the 2nd and 3rd fight, the only time there isn't a huge gap is between the 3rd and 4th, and those came along because Manny and his team thought that Marquez was right there and ripe for the picking, it backfired, he payed for it end of story

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1369
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    All 3 fights and they're punch stats said Pacquiao won.
    Punch stats only say who won in the amateurs.

  9. #9
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Fights like the first 3 are close and it's who refs that counts.

    All 3 fights and they're punch stats said Pacquiao won.

    I'm not a huge Pacquiao fan, but I want to see him vs mayweather, so he needs at least 2 good wins.

    JMM won't rematch him I bet, which is shocking because Pacquiao rematched him 3 times.
    Actually that's not true.

    Fight 1

    Marquez Landed 158 punches 122 power punches

    Pacquiao Landed 148 punches 100 power punches

    Fight 2

    Marquez Landed 172 punches 130 power punches

    Pacquiao Landed 157 punches 114 power punches

    So if you want to go by punchstats then JMM is 3-1 vs Pacquiao, but punchstats don't always tell the whole story. I actually thought JMM won more convincingly in the 3rd fight than he did the other two fights, yet punchstats had Manny Pacquiao landing more so go figure.

    I don't see why JMM has to rematch him again, many people think he won the other fights. And even if you think he didn't he KO'ed Pacquiao without leaving any doubt.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    655
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    929
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Everyone seems to forget the first knockdown of the marquez pacqiou fight. MArquez was on roids, it was much more than a well timed punch. To answer your question , no they weren't that bad. he is the second best fighter of our generation and top ten p4p imo. He still has a couple good fights in him but i doubt he can be himself again after a loss that bad. But then again he seems to have that personality unlike a Roy jones where it wont mess with him mentally, the big question is if there is any lingering physical damage. And i would absolutly love to see him fight floyd, depite everything i think he is the toughest fight for floyd, floyd has trouble with akward fighters, and southpaws, pacqiou is both, but ill still take floyd to dig deep and come out on top.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1972
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where Pacquiaos losses actually that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Fights like the first 3 are close and it's who refs that counts.

    All 3 fights and they're punch stats said Pacquiao won.

    I'm not a huge Pacquiao fan, but I want to see him vs mayweather, so he needs at least 2 good wins.

    JMM won't rematch him I bet, which is shocking because Pacquiao rematched him 3 times.
    Actually that's not true.

    Fight 1

    Marquez Landed 158 punches 122 power punches

    Pacquiao Landed 148 punches 100 power punches

    Fight 2

    Marquez Landed 172 punches 130 power punches

    Pacquiao Landed 157 punches 114 power punches

    So if you want to go by punchstats then JMM is 3-1 vs Pacquiao, but punchstats don't always tell the whole story. I actually thought JMM won more convincingly in the 3rd fight than he did the other two fights, yet punchstats had Manny Pacquiao landing more so go figure.

    I don't see why JMM has to rematch him again, many people think he won the other fights. And even if you think he didn't he KO'ed Pacquiao without leaving any doubt.

    punch stats are given too much weight, what if all those extra shots happened in one or two rounds? They're not generated by some super computer, it's some nerd trying to count shots as they go along.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1045
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    At 1999 Pacquiao had been knocked out early.

    He went 13 years without it happening again, but he is knockoutable, but managed 13 years to defend.

    I don't see him getting knocked out again.
    Yeah, just stay away from marquez.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1045
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Manny never slipped.
    Dont discredit 40 yr old marquez.
    Like i said before if manny fought marquez after oscar pacmania would not exist.
    Great fighters like manny just cant deal with smart fighters.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. pacquiaos latest interview
    By mnmc10 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2010, 03:01 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-07-2009, 01:37 PM
  3. Did Cotto and Pavlik get over their losses?
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 04:03 PM
  4. if pac losses
    By HOMETOWN CHAMP in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-28-2008, 11:39 PM
  5. Damn Commercials cockblocking Pacquiaos Fight?????
    By TheBESTP4P in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-22-2006, 06:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing