Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    816
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    BOTH Klitschkos, Lennox Lewis, ...... come on, if these guys were even 6 foot 3 like Ali or Holmes, and had say a 79 or 80 inch reach only (rather than their , what, 85 inch reaches?) they wouldn't have been around even half as long as they were.

    I am really starting to think that size is all that matters (90% anyway) in the heavyweight division as their is no ceiling there, no higher division they must not weigh into.

    Lennox Lewis and the K brothers could block punches from a mile away just by extending their gargantuan arms forward and back peddling at the same time.

    Like wise they could land overhand rights from halfway across the ring by throwing the punch and coming forward---the opponent even taking 4 steps backwards would still be on the end of the punch. Look at the punch Lennox Lewis landed on Vitali which cut his eye. He threw it from Mid-Ring and even with Vitali pulling back 3 steps in reverse the punch arched over the ring and came down about 15 feet later like a rainbow zooming in from outer space. If Lewis or Klitschkos had a standard reach of 78 inches or so, half of their punches would not have reached their target.

    And as for height---goddamit, lets see most normal-sized fighters try to reach their fucking chins at 6 feet 5 and above.

    These fighters would not have been shit were it not for their unusual size. Don't give me examples now of huge fighters who sucked. That will not disprove my points.
    Ill try to disprove you.



    They were all stopped multiple times during their careers.
    Mike Tyson was small.
    Joe Fraizer

    Wlad has destroyed massive fighters, yet couldn't stop Haye.
    Haye owned Valuev.

    Vitali has owned massive guys, couldn't stop Chisora.

    Theres a mix of things.

    Oliver McCall practiced like hell in training to land the right hand that KOd Lewis.

    It's all about tactics.
    Last edited by Vendettos; 06-23-2013 at 08:19 PM.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    BOTH Klitschkos, Lennox Lewis, ...... come on, if these guys were even 6 foot 3 like Ali or Holmes, and had say a 79 or 80 inch reach only (rather than their , what, 85 inch reaches?) they wouldn't have been around even half as long as they were.

    I am really starting to think that size is all that matters (90% anyway) in the heavyweight division as their is no ceiling there, no higher division they must not weigh into.

    Lennox Lewis and the K brothers could block punches from a mile away just by extending their gargantuan arms forward and back peddling at the same time.

    Like wise they could land overhand rights from halfway across the ring by throwing the punch and coming forward---the opponent even taking 4 steps backwards would still be on the end of the punch. Look at the punch Lennox Lewis landed on Vitali which cut his eye. He threw it from Mid-Ring and even with Vitali pulling back 3 steps in reverse the punch arched over the ring and came down about 15 feet later like a rainbow zooming in from outer space. If Lewis or Klitschkos had a standard reach of 78 inches or so, half of their punches would not have reached their target.

    And as for height---goddamit, lets see most normal-sized fighters try to reach their fucking chins at 6 feet 5 and above.

    These fighters would not have been shit were it not for their unusual size. Don't give me examples now of huge fighters who sucked. That will not disprove my points.
    Ill try to disprove you.



    They were all stopped multiple times during their careers.
    Mike Tyson was small.
    Joe Fraizer

    Wlad has destroyed massive fighters, yet couldn't stop Haye.
    Haye owned Valuev.

    Vitali has owned massive guys, couldn't stop Chisora.

    Theres a mix of things.

    Oliver McCall practiced like hell in training to land the right hand that KOd Lewis.

    It's all about tactics.
    He barely edged him on points

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1196
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    1. Tony Margarito as a welterweight
    2. Brandon Rios as a lightweight and junior welterweight
    3. Adrian Broner as a superfeather and lightweight
    4. Saul Alvarez as a junior middleweight
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2097
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Forget the differences in weight divisions too...

    Doesn't mean much come fight night, when one fighter has rehydrated 4lb and the other fighter has rehydrated 14lb or more...

    You've got middles fighting down at Welter and light Heavyweights fighting at middleweight, at least the heavyweight division is honest about it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1350
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Adam is dead on in both of his posts. Saying Lewis wouldn't have been dominant without his size is just as stupid as saying the same of Ivan Calderon for the most part.

    The point about divisions is a crucial one to. Guys who are huge for a weight or have a size advantage on fight night anywhere below HW, do so because they are able to shed water and rehydrate more than their opponent. Everyone is different in that sense, and obviously many guys put themselves in terrible shape doing the same thing that works tremendously for others.

    To me there isn't a lot which can be done about this as far as changing the weigh in times etc. Being able to cut weight while retaining power and the ilk is down to a science just like any other aspect of elite training. If some guys are better at it then that is a natural advantage just as being faster or stronger than someone is, at least the way I see it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    I say go to my proposal: you create a SuperHeavy Composite INdex based on 3 factors:

    whoops I
    .........wait OK

    1. Reach
    2. Height
    3. Weight

    for example, if a guy is above 6'4", has more than 80 inches in reach and weighs over 225 pounds, he would be scoring into the SuperHeavy division on all 3 criteria.

    if another guy is 6'7", 85 inch reach but only weighs 210, he would still---by taking the composite of the 3 criteria, qualify into the SuperHeavy division.

    but if a guy is 6'2" tall, 78 inch reach and weighs 217 pounds----how the fuck is that a fiar fight against a Lewis or a Klitschko? Thats my point.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1012
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    @brocktonblockbust

    I understand the point fundamentally Brockton. Given two men of equal skill and intangibles the bigger man wins. When this is not the case you get the Valuev’s and Carnera’s of the world and once in awhile a guy like Foreman who imo was short on skill but found a way because of his mutant power and sheer will.

    It took awhile for Wlad to get on track even with his size and skill set. One little thing like not knowing how to clinch or tie up allowed smaller less skilled guys to get to him. After years of honing his craft he now seems unbeatable albeit against a less then stellar crew of contenders. That’s where your theory may have some traction. How would these talented bigger guys do against a much better crop of smaller guys both skill wise with loads of drive and desire? We don’t have the division to test that hypothesis. Instead Mitchell will become the next challenger. And Lewis had the skill set along with above average power and he got ko’d by two people that couldn’t carry his jock strap. His size and pedigree as a fighter was trumped by his tendency to get lazy with an approach almost like a Rastafarian.

    Not a hev but still applicable is Paul Williams. Here is a guy that had every physical advantage you could ask for including the same wing span as both K brothers and yet he fought as if he was 5 foot 5 with a Ricky Hatton reach.

    Cool topic

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Montreal/Canada
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1240
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    1. Tony Margarito as a welterweight
    2. Brandon Rios as a lightweight and junior welterweight
    3. Adrian Broner as a superfeather and lightweight
    4. Saul Alvarez as a junior middleweight
    I agree.
    You can add on the list :
    5. Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. as a Middleweight
    6. Nonito Donaire as a flyweight and bantamweight

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. TOP 3 COUNTRIES WITH GREAT BOXERS
    By brucelee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 05:32 AM
  2. Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 12:58 AM
  3. End of the Road for Four Great Boxers...
    By ArawakWarria in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 04:35 AM
  4. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 04:48 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-04-2006, 07:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing