Felix Trindad would CRUSH Hagler...

[ykdadamaja]

Heretic, Blasphemous, Sacrilegious moment- HAGLER WASN'T ALL THAT!

Hagler could not beat: Ward, Roy Jones, Hopkins, Ray Robinson, Ray Leonard, Trinidad, Froch or even Kessler in their prime.

He could have beaten: Hearns (in a rematch), Joppy, DLH (knowing DLH is a Jr. Middle, at best), Vargas, Jermaine Taylor and/or Pavlik. But those names aren't going to solidify your stature.

I do not want to sound like Bean flicker, but SRR lost the title 5 times, so it was not his best weight.

But Hagler couldn't beat him...

[Master]

Heretic, Blasphemous, Sacrilegious moment- HAGLER WASN'T ALL THAT!

Hagler could not beat: Ward, Roy Jones, Hopkins, Ray Robinson, Ray Leonard, Trinidad, Froch or even Kessler in their prime.

He could have beaten: Hearns (in a rematch), Joppy, DLH (knowing DLH is a Jr. Middle, at best), Vargas, Jermaine Taylor and/or Pavlik. But those names aren't going to solidify your stature.

I do not want to sound like Bean flicker, but SRR lost the title 5 times, so it was not his best weight.

But Hagler couldn't beat him...

You think? Turpin did it and so did a few others, so it could be done.

[bigstinkybug]

Felix isn't a middleweight, and just cuz u fight at middle doesn't make u a middle weight... dummy... Hagler was a solid middleweight. Hagler would rush Tridad and crush him... if Hagler beat Hearns, he'd beat Trinidad... Hagler would crush Hopkins...

[IamInuit]

Felix isn't a middleweight, and just cuz u fight at middle doesn't make u a middle weight... dummy... Hagler was a solid middleweight. Hagler would rush Tridad and crush him... if Hagler beat Hearns, he'd beat Trinidad... Hagler would crush Hopkins...

Hagler beating Hearns has nothing to do with Hagler beating Tito. Polar opposites style wise. Tito's approach was made for Hagler. Tommy's was not but he fought Haglers fight from the opening bell.
Tommy actually had the ability to beat Hagler and instead tried to out slug him. As much as I like Tito, nothing about him gives him a shot. Hopkins/Hagler is a toss up

[Mr140]

Look Tito was a huge welterweight and he fit into to mw pretty well. The thing is that if you were a good boxer he lost if you could move well he lost. The only time he didn't is Oscar in which he got a gift a huge gift and thats the best win he ever had. Tito pretty overrated fighter and yea he would get crushed.

[Master]

Look Tito was a huge welterweight and he fit into to mw pretty well. The thing is that if you were a good boxer he lost if you could move well he lost. The only time he didn't is Oscar in which he got a gift a huge gift and thats the best win he ever had. Tito pretty overrated fighter and yea he would get crushed.

Obar Carr was a very good boxer and he got beat, you had to be a bit better than a good boxer. Give Tito some credit.

[ElTerribleMorales]

Trinidad isn't one of my fav fighters but hell don't try and play him down to be some run of the mill guy, he'll go down as one of THE BEST welterweight champions in history, he was one of if not the longest running Welterweight champions in the history of the sport (from 1993 to 1999, including 16 title defenses) and you don't have wins over the following by being just an ok fighter

Camacho
Campas
Carr
Whitaker
Reid
Vargas
Joppy
Mayorga

[TitoFan]

Look Tito was a huge welterweight and he fit into to mw pretty well. The thing is that if you were a good boxer he lost if you could move well he lost. The only time he didn't is Oscar in which he got a gift a huge gift and thats the best win he ever had. Tito pretty overrated fighter and yea he would get crushed.

There's knowledgeable posters..... and then there's you.

I'm the biggest Trinidad on this forum, and went on record early saying there was no chance Trinidad beats Hagler. Obviously a troll thread. But calling Trinidad overrated is just as ignorant.... which in your forum history is nothing surprising.

[bigstinkybug]

Felix isn't a middleweight, and just cuz u fight at middle doesn't make u a middle weight... dummy... Hagler was a solid middleweight. Hagler would rush Tridad and crush him... if Hagler beat Hearns, he'd beat Trinidad... Hagler would crush Hopkins...

Hagler beating Hearns has nothing to do with Hagler beating Tito. Polar opposites style wise. Tito's approach was made for Hagler. Tommy's was not but he fought Haglers fight from the opening bell.
Tommy actually had the ability to beat Hagler and instead tried to out slug him. As much as I like Tito, nothing about him gives him a shot. Hopkins/Hagler is a toss up

*Hearns was much taller, much more dangerous and harder to get to... Tito had no head movement and stood in front of u... there is no time in Tio's career when he was better than Hagler. Tito was a great welterweight, not a great middleweight... PERIOD.
Tito fought a solid middleweight IN Hopkins..and basically got manhandled... even as great as many think Hopkins is, there's no scenario where Hopkins beats Hagler, at his best... Hagler was a beast. He couldn't be hurt by a mortal man and systemtically tore opponents into pieces.. if there was a man who was really mean..it was Hagler. he was the modern day clubber Lang...did it all on his own and by his own rules. l