There are quite of load of guys on different forums that have been mentioning this. I sent a tweet to skysportsboxing about it as on twitter. It was very biased, worst ive saw from Sky
There are quite of load of guys on different forums that have been mentioning this. I sent a tweet to skysportsboxing about it as on twitter. It was very biased, worst ive saw from Sky
Yea I agree the commentating was a joke but it always is from sky.
The thread I was on guys were saying it was a robbery.
As always I sent you my score buddy.
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
I think they should use un bias commentary in Boxing ..I mean you wouldn't have an English referee in a world cup match against England vs France and you wouldn't have Joe Calzagahe's dad commentating on the Bernard Hopkins fight. My point is though unlike football the commentators actually have an influence over the audience's decision in a fight. They can swing it causing controversy, especially the Sky commentary rather than just commenting on punch stats and the actual fight its self they where droning on about how much trouble Rees was in and howmuch rees was missing and how Rees is shot or not trained enough etc etc, then on the other hand quoting how well Crolla was fighting.It was ok but not exactly class.
Anyway i though Crolla won the fight not quite as much as the commentary made out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks