Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
To be honest, I'm not a Rolling Stone reader. If the article turns out to be complete exploitative garbage, then I think they deserve the shit storm they get. But from what I've read of their intentions, I don't see anything wrong with going for what they are going for.
To me, saying that they needed to use an unflattering picture of him is agenda-driven in itself, and almost a form of censorship. The public aren't stupid, they remember the horrible thing that he did. But the fact is, he was a normal kid who was well liked, had friends and did and liked what most 20 year olds do.
And I usually shit on the media for intentionally using the most sinister/ominous pictures they can find. Just like they did with Zimmerman and Trayvon: sinister, mean looking pictures for Zimmerman. Innocent, baby-faced pics of Trayvon.
Array
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: Jahar's World | Culture News | Rolling Stone
One of the most liberal and intellectually sophisticated cities in the U.S., Cambridge is also one of the most ethnically and economically diverse.
.....I hope they didn't strain anything patting themselves on the back![]()
"In terms of politics, I'd say he's just as anti-American as the next guy in Cambridge"
There you have it....fucking liberals
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks