I missed the Chisora KO, I just got back home and found a shitty feed to this Saunders-osullivan fight. Saunders is way too much for this guy.
I missed the Chisora KO, I just got back home and found a shitty feed to this Saunders-osullivan fight. Saunders is way too much for this guy.
RE: The count in Chisora-Scott.
He rose at 9. That is not good enough. You do not get 10 seconds to get up, you get 10 seconds to be up and show the ref you are ready to fight. It's an unsatisfactory end but adhering to the rules. That is why every fighter in history gets up at 8 if they are able to.
Saddo Fantasy Premier League
2011/12 - 2nd
2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)
Saddo World Cup Dream Team
2014 - 1st Hidden Content
BBBC's rules of boxing-
3.33.2 If a Boxer regains his feet in the boxing ring within the specified intervals (10 seconds) but fails to satisfy the Referee that he is in a position and condition to defend himself, the Referee shall stop the Contest and deduct ten points from this score. He shall award the opponent ten points and declare him the winner.
i.e. you do not have 10 seconds to get up, you have 10 seconds to get up and show the ref you are ready and able to continue. It's annoying but it is what it is.
Saddo Fantasy Premier League
2011/12 - 2nd
2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)
Saddo World Cup Dream Team
2014 - 1st Hidden Content
It's a judgment call. He was up at 9. That much is clear from the replays. If the referee decided that he was not in a condition to defend himself, I can't fault him for stopping the contest. However, I didn't see the referee examine him at all to see if he was in a condition to defend himself. Further, from where I was sitting he appeared ready to defend himself. He got up fast. He had never been knocked down in the fight. He doesn't have a history of stoppages. I would have let him fight. But, I wasn't the third man in the ring.
I thought the announcers and referee were arguing that he wasn't up at 9, which clearly was the case, not that he wasn't in a condition to defend himself. If that was their argument, they were wrong.
He was up. The referee waved it off when he was up. I can't see an argument. The referee got it wrong. Good on Scott for being a gentleman about it, but he had every right to argue that call. From his point of view though, arguing it isn't gunna change the decision. Maybe he felt that by accepting it he'd have a better shot at getting a rematch. I expect to read numerous interviews this week were it is argued how wrong the decision was.
Saddo Fantasy Premier League
2011/12 - 2nd
2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)
Saddo World Cup Dream Team
2014 - 1st Hidden Content
I agree totally with Cleverly, no sympathy.
The ref was yelling the count in his face, and any tough fighter that was as unhurt and as able to continue as he looked would have been up at 3.
I believe he wanted no more of Del Boy because he didn't even seem that disappointed.
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks