Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    655
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    927
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    I am surprised and happy to see so many people giving credit to Roy, the way i like to look at this is say pound 4 pound, they fight, Jones wins that battle everytime in my humble opinion, i honestly don't think anyone in middleweight or light heavyweight history can beat a prime roy jones jr. That being said though, legacy wise, Floyd has a bit better resume(not roys fault) and he is more consistent in his old age. But then you have to look at the way roy jumped classes and obliterated guys. So all in all, Roy all the way, and this is coming from a huge Mayweather fan. Sorry for the thinking on text.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1043
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boxer4life View Post
    I am surprised and happy to see so many people giving credit to Roy, the way i like to look at this is say pound 4 pound, they fight, Jones wins that battle everytime in my humble opinion, i honestly don't think anyone in middleweight or light heavyweight history can beat a prime roy jones jr. That being said though, legacy wise, Floyd has a bit better resume(not roys fault) and he is more consistent in his old age. But then you have to look at the way roy jumped classes and obliterated guys. So all in all, Roy all the way, and this is coming from a huge Mayweather fan. Sorry for the thinking on text.
    True.

    Floyd is a multi weight champion as well though..he just will never make heavyweight.

  3. #3
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    For people not to give RJJ credit on winning the WBA title off of John Ruiz would be silly! RJJ not only won that fight but he blue printed John Ruiz and James Toney & David Haye used RJJ's gameplan to beat him. Before that only Tua had worked over Ruiz, everyone else, EVERYONE else had trouble with him and those guys weren't the puncher that Tua was.

    Floyd is amazing, but RJJ was just damned ridiculous...playing basketball before a fight, rapping his own intro, hands behind the back KO, I mean RJJ seriously clowned some very capable fighters.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Roy gets too much credit for beating Ruiz. It's more a minority of hardcore fans that understand he beat an average/ranked heavyweight not THE world champion. Was it a very impressive win for a light heavyweight? Yes. Does it mean he achieved some amazing unfathomable feat by beating a guy given a WBA title? No.

    Just in recent times, lots of fighters have have moved from lightheavy to beat average/ranked heavyweights.

    Overall though I'd pick prime Roy P4P over Floyd even though his record is inferior.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,482
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    I'm going to go with Roy. There's just a lot of feats included with roys resume that Mayweather wouldn't attempt. (The basketball game before the fight, fighting Hopkins and telesco one handed. Mayweather's only official knockdown came from the pain from breaking his hand in a fight and too his credit he survived for the decision...but you never saw him schooling guys with one hand the way roy did.

    There's a difference in the perceived level of competition. The games changed a little between the two fighters even though there was a span of years where they were fighting at the same time. The level of Roy's competition was dictated by mostly by title defenses. He sat on top of a pile of belts and defended against his mandatorys. Floyd, Martinez, broner, Paul Williams has/had the luxury of free wheeling through divisions cherry picking champions for belts without having to wait in line because the super fight money has trumped the honor and rules that used to be prevalent in the fight game. Roy only really started doing that at the end of his career and it was unnecessary. Can you imagine Roy fighting DLH at a catch weight and smoking him out 5 rounds...Or Trinidad... and doing to them what he did to pazienza.

    Every generation of boxer has their hype jobs.. but there seem to be a lot more now. You grab a volume puncher and take him to GNC and get him some supplements, give one of his opponent's ex wives or gf's to talk crap for a free trip to vegas and let the fighter's Jaw at each other for a bit and you label it to the casual fan as bad blood.. The fight sells and everyone gets a piece, but no ones looking at the disparity of the talent except the students of the game (us).

    Roy and Floyd are 2 special fighters but the environment has changed... so measuring them equally is harder.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    I say its a tie if they fought pound for pound i have to say i have no idea who would win. As for Jones winning belt against Ruiz i think its pretty impressive but does get overrated. When people talk pound for pound i say Holyfeild is up there consider he started as a Lhw and became a top atg Hw.

  7. #7
    jon09 Guest

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Not to start an argument but didn't Roy get busted for a form of steroids in his fight against Richard Hall? I love Roy and he was an awesome fighter but I feel that taints him somewhat. I think Floyd has been a consistent bad ass since 98 and has been in the ring ratings since then.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1043
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Quote Originally Posted by jon09 View Post
    Not to start an argument but didn't Roy get busted for a form of steroids in his fight against Richard Hall? I love Roy and he was an awesome fighter but I feel that taints him somewhat. I think Floyd has been a consistent bad ass since 98 and has been in the ring ratings since then.
    Such a good point.

    I love roy but theres no ignoring the steroid issue.

    Floyds prime is still going.

    Thats dominance

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    VA for life, 2 up 2 down
    Posts
    617
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    875
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Quote Originally Posted by jon09 View Post
    Not to start an argument but didn't Roy get busted for a form of steroids in his fight against Richard Hall? I love Roy and he was an awesome fighter but I feel that taints him somewhat. I think Floyd has been a consistent bad ass since 98 and has been in the ring ratings since then.
    I remember this but he seemingly got a pass as he proved that it was a tainted supplement. If I recall correctly it was TwinLabs Ripped Fuel or something like that.
    If you think you can......you can, if you think you can't .......you're right!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Quote Originally Posted by jon09 View Post
    Not to start an argument but didn't Roy get busted for a form of steroids in his fight against Richard Hall? I love Roy and he was an awesome fighter but I feel that taints him somewhat. I think Floyd has been a consistent bad ass since 98 and has been in the ring ratings since then.
    It doesn't taint him at all. Taking steroids is considered cheating. It gives one fighter an advantage over the other one. When that happens it's no longer a level playing field. That's wasn't the case here. Hall himself also tested positive. Making it a level playing field. No fighter had an advantage over the other one. So no cheating ever took place.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1043
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Floyd has continued to dominate all types of opponents even though he is usually the smaller guy.
    We dont even know when floyds prime started and when it will end.

    Roy was clearly a superb talent and i was obvious the weight loss after ruiz was going to affect him but that was all muscle loss which made it even worse.

    After coming down and beating tarver in the fight of his life the mental side of things for roy had gone and he had nothing left to achieve.

    Roy and floyd are two of the greatest boxers of all time and I couldnt choose between the two.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    813
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Its easy for me to pick. Before Roy fizzled out he was 50-0 (49-1 because of the BS disqualification loss) with 40 KO's. And only like 10 decision wins all of which weren't even close decisions.

    Roy was easily more dominant. No one could even touch Roy before Roy was 34-35.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV USA
    Posts
    659
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    691
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Roy gets too much credit for beating Ruiz. It's more a minority of hardcore fans that understand he beat an average/ranked heavyweight not THE world champion. Was it a very impressive win for a light heavyweight? Yes. Does it mean he achieved some amazing unfathomable feat by beating a guy given a WBA title? No.

    Just in recent times, lots of fighters have have moved from lightheavy to beat average/ranked heavyweights.

    Overall though I'd pick prime Roy P4P over Floyd even though his record is inferior.
    I agree. I think the HW win against Ruiz was one of the least of his accomplishments. That said, Roy owned the sport along with every belt known to man for a decade. Father Time beat Roy the worst. He seemed to get old literally overnight. He also carried himself as a champion better imo. Roy was one of a kind, Floyd is just a HOF'er.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1423
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Roy gets too much credit for beating Ruiz. It's more a minority of hardcore fans that understand he beat an average/ranked heavyweight not THE world champion. Was it a very impressive win for a light heavyweight? Yes. Does it mean he achieved some amazing unfathomable feat by beating a guy given a WBA title? No.

    Just in recent times, lots of fighters have have moved from lightheavy to beat average/ranked heavyweights.

    Overall though I'd pick prime Roy P4P over Floyd even though his record is inferior.
    But he did something no other fighter has even done. No fighter who won a world title at 160 ever went to Heavyweight and did the same. Credit where credit is due for me. Ruiz wasn't the best, but he was a legitimate champion and Roy schooled him.

    As for who was more dominant, I'd go with Roy. He just sailed past his opposition. Floyd's fights always seem more competative.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Roy gets too much credit for beating Ruiz. It's more a minority of hardcore fans that understand he beat an average/ranked heavyweight not THE world champion. Was it a very impressive win for a light heavyweight? Yes. Does it mean he achieved some amazing unfathomable feat by beating a guy given a WBA title? No.

    Just in recent times, lots of fighters have have moved from lightheavy to beat average/ranked heavyweights.

    Overall though I'd pick prime Roy P4P over Floyd even though his record is inferior.
    But he did something no other fighter has even done. No fighter who won a world title at 160 ever went to Heavyweight and did the same. Credit where credit is due for me. Ruiz wasn't the best, but he was a legitimate champion and Roy schooled him.

    As for who was more dominant, I'd go with Roy. He just sailed past his opposition. Floyd's fights always seem more competative.
    "Legitimate champion?" The only reason he had the WBA title is because they stripped Lewis. Take away the WBA title and Roy beat a heavyweight, which is something that numerous middleweights have done throughout history.

    In the good old days, when there was only one champion, the middleweights trying to dethrone THE heavyweight champ were facing guys like Louis, Marciano etc. There wasn't four "world" champions to pick from. Roy basically beat a fighter he was giving 30lb too. It's common these days. James Toney went from middleweight to beat Ruiz and a bunch of other heavyweights including Holyfield.

    (by the way Bob Fitzsimmons was the first to do it )
    Last edited by Fenster; 07-24-2013 at 02:14 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Prime roy jones vs prime gerald mcclellan
    By imp in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-09-2011, 10:59 PM
  2. Prime Calzaghe vs Prime Jones Jr. who wins?
    By southakron314 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: 07-11-2008, 06:57 AM
  3. How dominant does Floyd have to be against Hatton?
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 11-25-2007, 04:45 AM
  4. Roy Jones "Floyd needs to fight Prime fighters"
    By artest2000 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 08:53 PM
  5. Prime Mike McCallum vs Prime Roy Jones Jr
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-04-2007, 05:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing