Re: Roy Jones and Floyd : who was more dominant in their prime?

Originally Posted by
bzkfn

Originally Posted by
Fenster
Roy gets too much credit for beating Ruiz. It's more a minority of hardcore fans that understand he beat an average/ranked heavyweight not THE world champion. Was it a very impressive win for a light heavyweight? Yes. Does it mean he achieved some amazing unfathomable feat by beating a guy given a WBA title? No.
Just in recent times, lots of fighters have have moved from lightheavy to beat average/ranked heavyweights.
Overall though I'd pick prime Roy P4P over Floyd even though his record is inferior.
But he did something no other fighter has even done. No fighter who won a world title at 160 ever went to Heavyweight and did the same. Credit where credit is due for me. Ruiz wasn't the best, but he was a legitimate champion and Roy schooled him.
As for who was more dominant, I'd go with Roy. He just sailed past his opposition. Floyd's fights always seem more competative.
"Legitimate champion?" The only reason he had the WBA title is because they stripped Lewis. Take away the WBA title and Roy beat a heavyweight, which is something that numerous middleweights have done throughout history.
In the good old days, when there was only one champion, the middleweights trying to dethrone THE heavyweight champ were facing guys like Louis, Marciano etc. There wasn't four "world" champions to pick from. Roy basically beat a fighter he was giving 30lb too. It's common these days. James Toney went from middleweight to beat Ruiz and a bunch of other heavyweights including Holyfield.
(by the way Bob Fitzsimmons was the first to do it
)
Last edited by Fenster; 07-24-2013 at 02:14 PM.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks