Is technical skill overrated in the higher weights?

[boyla]

You have to be technically competent, proficient.
You do not need to be technically perfect.

From your statement, if at heavier weights, a boxer can have knockout power in one punch, does technique not matter as much.

If he is not technically sound, he will not transfer the weight behind the punch so is not being efficient at punching, not maximizing his power.

If he doesn't have technique in his footwork he will not be able to move in to a position to land the punch.
If he has a flawed technique he may be off balance to defend a counter or deliver a follow up punch.

You also need technique to avoid or block a punch. As Manju stated.

Not every one is going to move or punch identically to another boxer, and there will be variations in a left hook for example.
But if you don't have the basic technique you will be making life very difficult for yourself.

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

I'd say proper conditioning at heavyweight is vastly underrated.

[greynotsoold]

At any weight class, one punch can turn a fight around or end it. Happens less with smaller guys because they tend to be better fighters. Technical skill and boxing intelligence tend to be rare among HWs; big and dumb and all that.

[Master]

Technical skill is important at the higher weights people like Wilder cannot flourish on power alone. They would eventually be exposed.

[El Kabong]

OK, I'm going to do my best Teddy Atlas......

You want to get from point A to point B and having technical ability is like having a GPS. If you miss a turn you can recalculate how to get there, if your opponent is blocking your path that technical ability gives you the knowledge to find a detour around that defense and BANG! Reach your destination, which is your opponent on the mat for a 10 count!


So basically you can have the biggest baddest weapons ever but if you can't get from A to B then once you fight a guy who has knowledge of how to box or can take and/or nullify your weapons then you're going to be screwed. There's all kinds of big punchers who have been just demolished by pure boxers.

[Memphis]

Its not overrated but people aren't particularly interested in it. You're Joe Bloggs tuning in to a heavyweight fight. Do you want to see a chess match between two technically gifted fighters or two less skilled guys smash lumps off of one another for a few rounds. I know which I'd prefer. The purists amongst us may say the former but they will be in the overwhelming minority.

Get half a dozen guys at the same time who are right hard cunts and skilled at the same time then you're laughing. We don't got that right now.

[Spicoli]

If anything I'd say power at heavier weights can be overstated. Power isn't anything unless you can likewise read it, roll it and avoid it. Gears, you have to have gears and a plan B and count on your opponent knowing the whole damn alphabet. People love raw power and a good conclusive ko but there is a lot of satisfaction in breaking a guy down and gradually busting him up. I think some heavyweights get a pass at times with the ko and effect. It's understandable but honestly any weight chucking bricks but not boxing polished can have the same effect in hundreds of random 6 rounders.

[Beanflicker]

Technical skill is essential at any weight, I just think there is a different type of "technical skill" at different weights.

Obviously, a heavyweight can't fight like a welterweight. It doesn't work ergonomically. A larger body burns more energy and oxygen with motion than a smaller body.

It can be argued that, with the added danger of heavyweight punching power, technical skills are even more important.