Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: How would you rate Ward's resume?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,883
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    I would like to see ward on one of those 24/7 specials or something.
    I do not think he is exciting enough to carry one of those off.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,070
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1839
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    I would like to see ward on one of those 24/7 specials or something.
    I do not think he is exciting enough to carry one of those off.
    I agree but there is the possibility that he'll use up all of boxing's allotted god shout outs and no one will be able to do it again, ever.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1061
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    I would like to see ward on one of those 24/7 specials or something.
    I do not think he is exciting enough to carry one of those off.
    I agree but there is the possibility that he'll use up all of boxing's allotted god shout outs and no one will be able to do it again, ever.
    Yeah, hes not exciting but he still is a nice guy and perhaps that might even make him more appealing.

    Worth a go.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    It is very good. It merits his p4p mention. I would caution that to consider it great one necessarily rates Froch and Kessler highly, as they are his two most significant wins.

    Froch's resume arguably is close to as good as Ward's, but he'll always be a step behind in ranking because he lost to Ward and he lost to Kessler in their first fight. However, Froch has wins over Pascal, Bute, Andre Dirrell, and Kessler too, the first three of which Ward doesn't have. I know some people thought Froch lost to Dirrell, but at least Froch fought Dirrell. We don't know what would have happened had Dirrell fought Ward.

    Where does Ward go now? There doesn't appear to be anyone else at super middleweight for him to face. There are a bunch of contenders at 175 in Stevenson, Kovalev, Hopkins (GB), and the Pascal/Bute winner, but if he doesn't need to step up in weight, should he do so and take the additional risk?

    GGG is a potential future foe, but GGG has a stacked division to take care of first. I'm not sure why he would jump up to face Ward now, when he could take on the other top guys at middleweight first.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    983
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Ward is a very good fighter, but his style of boxing will never give him a large fan base,
    ever one he's faced he has beaten them, he has a first class resume.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It is very good. It merits his p4p mention. I would caution that to consider it great one necessarily rates Froch and Kessler highly, as they are his two most significant wins.

    Froch's resume arguably is close to as good as Ward's, but he'll always be a step behind in ranking because he lost to Ward and he lost to Kessler in their first fight. However, Froch has wins over Pascal, Bute, Andre Dirrell, and Kessler too, the first three of which Ward doesn't have. I know some people thought Froch lost to Dirrell, but at least Froch fought Dirrell. We don't know what would have happened had Dirrell fought Ward.

    Where does Ward go now? There doesn't appear to be anyone else at super middleweight for him to face. There are a bunch of contenders at 175 in Stevenson, Kovalev, Hopkins (GB), and the Pascal/Bute winner, but if he doesn't need to step up in weight, should he do so and take the additional risk?

    GGG is a potential future foe, but GGG has a stacked division to take care of first. I'm not sure why he would jump up to face Ward now, when he could take on the other top guys at middleweight first.

    Dirrell is a basket case, who says he wanted to fight Ward at any point? It would have happened if the super six had panned out differently, and I'd agree that's a hard style for Ward but he's so much tougher upstairs. Bute for all we know was fairly content being fed mid level guys in his backyard until the Froch beatdown, you don't think Ward would've taken that fight instead? He's in a bad spot because guys he beats are still worth a lot more money than he is, it's hardly a knock on his resume surely.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    983
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It is very good. It merits his p4p mention. I would caution that to consider it great one necessarily rates Froch and Kessler highly, as they are his two most significant wins.

    Froch's resume arguably is close to as good as Ward's, but he'll always be a step behind in ranking because he lost to Ward and he lost to Kessler in their first fight. However, Froch has wins over Pascal, Bute, Andre Dirrell, and Kessler too, the first three of which Ward doesn't have. I know some people thought Froch lost to Dirrell, but at least Froch fought Dirrell. We don't know what would have happened had Dirrell fought Ward.

    Where does Ward go now? There doesn't appear to be anyone else at super middleweight for him to face. There are a bunch of contenders at 175 in Stevenson, Kovalev, Hopkins (GB), and the Pascal/Bute winner, but if he doesn't need to step up in weight, should he do so and take the additional risk?

    GGG is a potential future foe, but GGG has a stacked division to take care of first. I'm not sure why he would jump up to face Ward now, when he could take on the other top guys at middleweight first.

    Dirrell is a basket case, who says he wanted to fight Ward at any point? It would have happened if the super six had panned out differently, and I'd agree that's a hard style for Ward but he's so much tougher upstairs. Bute for all we know was fairly content being fed mid level guys in his backyard until the Froch beatdown, you don't think Ward would've taken that fight instead? He's in a bad spot because guys he beats are still worth a lot more money than he is, it's hardly a knock on his resume surely.
    What your saying Ward is not entertaining.!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It is very good. It merits his p4p mention. I would caution that to consider it great one necessarily rates Froch and Kessler highly, as they are his two most significant wins.

    Froch's resume arguably is close to as good as Ward's, but he'll always be a step behind in ranking because he lost to Ward and he lost to Kessler in their first fight. However, Froch has wins over Pascal, Bute, Andre Dirrell, and Kessler too, the first three of which Ward doesn't have. I know some people thought Froch lost to Dirrell, but at least Froch fought Dirrell. We don't know what would have happened had Dirrell fought Ward.

    Where does Ward go now? There doesn't appear to be anyone else at super middleweight for him to face. There are a bunch of contenders at 175 in Stevenson, Kovalev, Hopkins (GB), and the Pascal/Bute winner, but if he doesn't need to step up in weight, should he do so and take the additional risk?

    GGG is a potential future foe, but GGG has a stacked division to take care of first. I'm not sure why he would jump up to face Ward now, when he could take on the other top guys at middleweight first.

    Dirrell is a basket case, who says he wanted to fight Ward at any point? It would have happened if the super six had panned out differently, and I'd agree that's a hard style for Ward but he's so much tougher upstairs. Bute for all we know was fairly content being fed mid level guys in his backyard until the Froch beatdown, you don't think Ward would've taken that fight instead? He's in a bad spot because guys he beats are still worth a lot more money than he is, it's hardly a knock on his resume surely.
    What your saying Ward is not entertaining.!
    I'm always entertained by boxing at a high level, but yes even I don't relish watching him fight and totally understand some people not liking him at all. He's a very smart fighter, clearly the 2nd best boxing brain out there imo, but just doesn't have the physical tools to put any sizzle on top of it all. He was trying to be Roy Jones for a while before he fought anyone half decent and it got him in big trouble. If he was just a tad faster, or had a bit more pop he would be torturing guys.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    You can't factor in entertainment value when judging a fighters record. It's just simple facts and figures.

    Ward is about as genuine a world champ you can get in this pathetic multi-champ boxing world. He's not only beat his closest rivals he has formlines that put him above all the top men he hasn't faced.

    Who wants to list supermiddles with better records? Lets go
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    907
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It is very good. It merits his p4p mention. I would caution that to consider it great one necessarily rates Froch and Kessler highly, as they are his two most significant wins.

    Froch's resume arguably is close to as good as Ward's, but he'll always be a step behind in ranking because he lost to Ward and he lost to Kessler in their first fight. However, Froch has wins over Pascal, Bute, Andre Dirrell, and Kessler too, the first three of which Ward doesn't have. I know some people thought Froch lost to Dirrell, but at least Froch fought Dirrell. We don't know what would have happened had Dirrell fought Ward.

    Where does Ward go now? There doesn't appear to be anyone else at super middleweight for him to face. There are a bunch of contenders at 175 in Stevenson, Kovalev, Hopkins (GB), and the Pascal/Bute winner, but if he doesn't need to step up in weight, should he do so and take the additional risk?

    GGG is a potential future foe, but GGG has a stacked division to take care of first. I'm not sure why he would jump up to face Ward now, when he could take on the other top guys at middleweight first.

    Dirrell is a basket case, who says he wanted to fight Ward at any point? It would have happened if the super six had panned out differently, and I'd agree that's a hard style for Ward but he's so much tougher upstairs. Bute for all we know was fairly content being fed mid level guys in his backyard until the Froch beatdown, you don't think Ward would've taken that fight instead? He's in a bad spot because guys he beats are still worth a lot more money than he is, it's hardly a knock on his resume surely.
    Agreed. Ward-Dirrell was scheduled before Dirrell pulled out of the Super 6, iirc that was when Green stepped in as Dirrell's replacement. Since then he's become an irrelevance because of a lack of activity. There wasn't really a window for Ward to fight Bute either as Bute fought Froch a few months after Froch-Ward. It can't be a knock on Ward that those 2 fights didn't happen.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How would you rate Ward's resume?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It is very good. It merits his p4p mention. I would caution that to consider it great one necessarily rates Froch and Kessler highly, as they are his two most significant wins.

    Froch's resume arguably is close to as good as Ward's, but he'll always be a step behind in ranking because he lost to Ward and he lost to Kessler in their first fight. However, Froch has wins over Pascal, Bute, Andre Dirrell, and Kessler too, the first three of which Ward doesn't have. I know some people thought Froch lost to Dirrell, but at least Froch fought Dirrell. We don't know what would have happened had Dirrell fought Ward.

    Where does Ward go now? There doesn't appear to be anyone else at super middleweight for him to face. There are a bunch of contenders at 175 in Stevenson, Kovalev, Hopkins (GB), and the Pascal/Bute winner, but if he doesn't need to step up in weight, should he do so and take the additional risk?

    GGG is a potential future foe, but GGG has a stacked division to take care of first. I'm not sure why he would jump up to face Ward now, when he could take on the other top guys at middleweight first.

    Dirrell is a basket case, who says he wanted to fight Ward at any point? It would have happened if the super six had panned out differently, and I'd agree that's a hard style for Ward but he's so much tougher upstairs. Bute for all we know was fairly content being fed mid level guys in his backyard until the Froch beatdown, you don't think Ward would've taken that fight instead? He's in a bad spot because guys he beats are still worth a lot more money than he is, it's hardly a knock on his resume surely.
    Agreed. Ward-Dirrell was scheduled before Dirrell pulled out of the Super 6, iirc that was when Green stepped in as Dirrell's replacement. Since then he's become an irrelevance because of a lack of activity. There wasn't really a window for Ward to fight Bute either as Bute fought Froch a few months after Froch-Ward. It can't be a knock on Ward that those 2 fights didn't happen.
    Not a knock on Ward, but it doesn't change the fact that Froch has wins over Bute and Dirrell, and Ward doesn't.

    The main question we've been asking for the last year is where does Ward go from here? Dirrell is out of the mix at 168 due to inactivity. Ward already beat Bika and Froch, the other titleholders. The only other fight at 168 that Ward could take would be Anthony Dirrell, assuming he is actually fighting these days, unless, of course, Groves beats Froch. After that, unfortunately, he doesn't have much choice but to jump to 175.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-20-2011, 01:14 PM
  2. Ward's ambition to fight at heavyweight
    By donnydarkoIRL in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-03-2011, 12:38 AM
  3. Andre Ward's Chin ?
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 04:50 PM
  4. Andre Ward's next fight
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2007, 02:02 PM
  5. Just watched Andre Ward's fight
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-04-2006, 10:38 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing