Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1404
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    The only reason they fought in the same era is that EVERYONE wanted to see the Mike Tyson that made sense of a division again. In fact some enjoyed just watching him knock out anyone, even if it wasnt a meaningfull fight.

    Who did Mike beat after prison? I think one of his best wins was against Golota (after prison). He just wasnt the same fighter that his opponents struggled to land on or defend every punch in a lightening 5 punch combination.

    He stood static in front of opponents and threw one shot at a time and not because he thought it was better to fight that way but hed forgotton what made him great and no one he was prepaired to have as his trainer could teach or remind him of it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,500
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    I still have a poster for the 1991 clash.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    991
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I still have a poster for the 1991 clash.
    No poster here, but I have an old mag, Bert Randolph Sugar's Boxing Illustrated.

    It says the Champ Holyfield was guaranteed 30 million and Tyson 15 million, with both getting a percentage of ppv tv receipts. The promoters were anticipating grossing 100 million dollars in Nov 1991. Tyson was an 11-5 favorite at the time of publication, and the Ruddock rematch in June 1991 had already happened.


    Hey Master, we all know Buster did have some talent but psychologically, he ran hot-and-cold, sometimes motivated, sometimes not giving a $#!t.
    Do you think Buster could have got up from the Holyfield knockdown?
    Do you think Buster just decided to stay down knowing he had a 24 million dollar payday win or lose?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    I think Holyfeild had Tyson number and he actual won a lot of his big fights and was not crushing cans a lot of his career. I laugh when people say Tyson was not prime because neither was Holyfiled. I mean if i had to call the last prime version i say it was Bowie rematch he won after that Holyfeild had some really bad problems health wise after. Holyfeild was just more solid on his fundamentals then Tyson was so he pretty much outclassed him even though he was older and in worst way when it came to his health.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1404
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Holyfield took steroids to get to the top and stay there and had been active.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    For one all we know most boxer have taken steroids even your god Tyson has. Thing is did Holyfeild ever fail a test in 26 years that he been fighting because since he was such a huge user pretty much says it all. As for them fighting i say Holyfield wins anytime was better fighter and had better wins in his career. I dont really think if mike came in the 90's during his prime he would of looked as good to be honest with you. The 90's had alot top fighters including the men who beat him Holyfield and Lewis during the later part was quite good as well.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,500
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    For one all we know most boxer have taken steroids even your god Tyson has. Thing is did Holyfeild ever fail a test in 26 years that he been fighting because since he was such a huge user pretty much says it all. As for them fighting i say Holyfield wins anytime was better fighter and had better wins in his career.
    My god Tyson did not take PED he just took recreational drugs and alcohol.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    991
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    I think Holyfeild had Tyson number and he actual won a lot of his big fights and was not crushing cans a lot of his career. I laugh when people say Tyson was not prime because neither was Holyfiled. I mean if i had to call the last prime version i say it was Bowie rematch he won after that Holyfeild had some really bad problems health wise after. Holyfeild was just more solid on his fundamentals then Tyson was so he pretty much outclassed him even though he was older and in worst way when it came to his health.
    I don't think Holyfield had better fundamentals than Tyson.
    Holyfield was more versatile. For example Tyson couldn't fight going backwards, Holy could.
    Holyfield had many Great attributes, bur he had some shortcomings:
    I think Holyfield fought off-balance a lot.
    He didn't move his head enough; that's why he got hit so cleanly by so many fighters; he'd just stand there. His world-class chin, one of the best in Boxing, is what kept him in there many times.
    He didn't have Heavyweight power, and part of that was all that nonsensical bouncing around excuse-for-footwork he'd do. When you bounce like that, your feet aren't planted, and you lose power.
    He also hardly ever gets called for all the rule-breaking he did with his chronic head-butting and elbows.
    Tyson, likewise had many Great attributes and some shortcomings, but he had excellent fundamentals for the style he utilized as a 5'11" guy consistently fighting 6'4" guys.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,500
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    I think Holyfeild had Tyson number and he actual won a lot of his big fights and was not crushing cans a lot of his career. I laugh when people say Tyson was not prime because neither was Holyfiled. I mean if i had to call the last prime version i say it was Bowie rematch he won after that Holyfeild had some really bad problems health wise after. Holyfeild was just more solid on his fundamentals then Tyson was so he pretty much outclassed him even though he was older and in worst way when it came to his health.
    I don't think Holyfield had better fundamentals than Tyson.
    Holyfield was more versatile. For example Tyson couldn't fight going backwards, Holy could.
    Holyfield had many Great attributes, bur he had some shortcomings:
    I think Holyfield fought off-balance a lot.
    He didn't move his head enough; that's why he got hit so cleanly by so many fighters; he'd just stand there. His world-class chin, one of the best in Boxing, is what kept him in there many times.
    He didn't have Heavyweight power, and part of that was all that nonsensical bouncing around excuse-for-footwork he'd do. When you bounce like that, your feet aren't planted, and you lose power.
    He also hardly ever gets called for all the rule-breaking he did with his chronic head-butting and elbows.
    Tyson, likewise had many Great attributes and some shortcomings, but he had excellent fundamentals for the style he utilized as a 5'11" guy consistently fighting 6'4" guys.
    Tyson could be pushed back but he came at you from the sides and obliterated you.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    991
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Yep, that's the liability of squaring up: you can be pushed back, neutralizing your punching power because you don't have time to punch before getting pushed back.
    The advantage is more torque and power on your hooks and uppercuts when you get inside...
    Holyfeild was very masterful in how he took advantage of that.

    It's not how Buster defeated Tyson at all.

    I always think of Buster getting off first with long-range right-hand leads...
    Very dangerous to throw right-hand leads, but it worked for Buster on Tyson, and it worked for Ali on Foreman...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,500
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I still have a poster for the 1991 clash.
    No poster here, but I have an old mag, Bert Randolph Sugar's Boxing Illustrated.

    It says the Champ Holyfield was guaranteed 30 million and Tyson 15 million, with both getting a percentage of ppv tv receipts. The promoters were anticipating grossing 100 million dollars in Nov 1991. Tyson was an 11-5 favorite at the time of publication, and the Ruddock rematch in June 1991 had already happened.


    Hey Master, we all know Buster did have some talent but psychologically, he ran hot-and-cold, sometimes motivated, sometimes not giving a $#!t.
    Do you think Buster could have got up from the Holyfield knockdown?
    Do you think Buster just decided to stay down knowing he had a 24 million dollar payday win or lose?
    Definitely Buster could have gotten up and he decided to stay down and collect the cheque without minimal damage. He was going to lose anyway he was not motivated as he was against Tyson. Now that version would have never have gone down in the first place and may have won.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    991
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    It was good that the Holyfield/Tyson fight finally happened in 1996, and it is a classic fight, but we can only dream what would have happened if the fight had happened 5 years earlier...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,500
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson VS Holyfield in 91

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    It was good that the Holyfield/Tyson fight finally happened in 1996, and it is a classic fight, but we can only dream what would have happened if the fight had happened 5 years earlier...
    Yes the fight was under rated, Tyson nearly knocked him out with the first punch! After 5 rounds Tyson was shot and started trying to get out of the fight. When that was not going to happen he took his beating and went out on his shield.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Holyfield VS Tyson III??
    By BoxerGaz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-01-2008, 08:04 PM
  2. Holyfield v Tyson 3 :(
    By Dark Lord Al in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-29-2008, 12:53 AM
  3. Holyfield-Tyson again?
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-28-2008, 06:27 PM
  4. Holyfield v tyson II
    By Preme in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-30-2007, 09:55 PM
  5. Tyson vs. Holyfield lll
    By T.N.T in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-17-2006, 07:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing