Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Should we support the Syrian rebels?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 197

Thread: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,164
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1420
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    So basically Miles was as wrong as Lyle in his riot thread. It makes no difference though because he just likes a rant. Empty vessel. International law only when it suits his politics.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    So basically Miles was as wrong as Lyle in his riot thread. It makes no difference though because he just likes a rant. Empty vessel. International law only when it suits his politics.
    Eh? Britain might be out of it, but America might well be going ahead as planned, so don't count your chickens.

    I'm all for international law, unlike a lot of so called law professors and politicians. I don't believe it is our fight and we won't be thanked for anything by marching in with a 'show of force'. There is still no evidence that Assad was responsible and we know who has a history of using chemical weapons. And lest we forget, we actively supported Saddam when he did use chemical weapons. If we were to intervene in Syria there would have been a case in 2011 as argued by the Robert Fisk over at the Independent, but to say we now have to get involved over an inconclusive chemical attack. Well, that is picking an arbitrary time for intervention considering a hundred thousand and more are dead already. You can't just pick a side and bomb them and use doctored and fabricated evidence which we have a history of doing. WMD anyone? Evidence that Bin Laden orchestrated 9-11? Gulf of Tonkin? Etc etc.

    At least be genuine and say you want to help people. Don't talk about protecting US interests and red lines just to display force to Iran in order to make Israel happy. That in itself is a blatant disregard for everyone suffering in Syria. America couldn't give two hoots about anyone in the Middle East, history has shown it time and time again. Even now nobody cares about the Syrians. All I read in the papers is how we might have hurt our standing with America. Are these people serious? Is that really the crux of the argument?

    It is pathetic. The simpering politicians of the UK right through to the sociopathic US political realm....they are hideous. We have taken sides and are channeling resources to the rebels. Surely if you are to get involved then that is enough. Let Iran and Hezbollah support Assad and let America and Britain support the terrorist factions. However, arbitrarily bombing places, would be doing nothing more than to say 'Look Iran, we have bigger weapons'. Posturing that will only slaughter Syrians, though Obama likes to wipe out people from the air as we well know.
    Last edited by Gandalf; 08-30-2013 at 02:14 PM. Reason: Eradication of weird use of the word 'ducky'. Just odd.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,155
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    So basically Miles was as wrong as Lyle in his riot thread. It makes no difference though because he just likes a rant. Empty vessel. International law only when it suits his politics.
    That makes Miles the same as every country out there.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1067
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Well, england are out of it now.

    Usa and france are now best of buddies.

    Embarressing for Mr.Cameron..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4200
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Well, england are out of it now.

    Usa and france are now best of buddies.

    Embarressing for Mr.Cameron..
    Dont worry Australias leaders are signed up and as dumb as sheep shit, we will follow the USA and their Jewish backed leaders into where ever they go, as usual .
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Well, england are out of it now.

    Usa and france are now best of buddies.

    Embarressing for Mr.Cameron..
    Dont worry Australias leaders are signed up and as dumb as sheep shit, we will follow the USA and their Jewish backed leaders into where ever they go, as usual .


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4200
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Well, england are out of it now.

    Usa and france are now best of buddies.

    Embarressing for Mr.Cameron..
    Dont worry Australias leaders are signed up and as dumb as sheep shit, we will follow the USA and their Jewish backed leaders into where ever they go, as usual .

    Yep and more innocent people will be hurt except by us this time and then their kids will grow up to hate our kids and they'll get caught up in the other bullshit religion and go train in the deserts to bring more of our buildings down or our public down by bombing more innocents off earth.

    The leaders of these waring countries and opposing religions are the ones who we should be removing off the face of the Earth not the general public who always get crushed as the pawns these days.

    == vengeance and so it goes on like a cancer from the heads down.

    Here you go Brockton...

    Last edited by Andre; 08-31-2013 at 06:05 AM.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4200
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1067
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    So what after obama gets the nod from congress in ten days what exactly will be the first stage of action?

    1. Bomb syria
    2. Drop bombs on syria
    3. Use cruise missiles on syria
    4. Bomb russia for getting cheeky.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    948
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Well, like George Carlin said, America loves to bomb brown people.

    I think we should do it. Basaad or whatever his name is is getting crazy. He needs a spanking. Only problem being many of his opponents are Al Queda sympathizers. Kind of a win lose situation. Since we (the US) are declining in status around the world, let's show off some of our hardware to keep everyone in check.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    What a great attitude: 'Let's kill some people, just to show that we are tough'. If Assad is crazy, then surely you would have to agree that Obama is equally crazy. As far as I know Assad has never assasinated anyone in America which is precisely what America did to Bin Laden in Pakistan. If you are to use the word crazy for one situation then you have to apply it to another. Assad isn't droning people in Israel on a weekly basis. Assad is defending himself in a civil war, the basic logic to apply is that this is nothing to do with Obama and by logical extension that Obama himself is crazy for getting involved in something nobody else wants to be involved in.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,164
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1420
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    So now you are an apologist for Bin Laden? Get a grip Miles.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Nope,just covert assasinsination on sovereign land resulting in blatant murder and no attempt to capture him. Very illegal.

  14. #14
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Well, like George Carlin said, America loves to bomb brown people.

    I think we should do it. Basaad or whatever his name is is getting crazy. He needs a spanking. Only problem being many of his opponents are Al Queda sympathizers. Kind of a win lose situation. Since we (the US) are declining in status around the world, let's show off some of our hardware to keep everyone in check.
    In doing so we would be the Air Force for Al Qaeda....you cool with that?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Well, like George Carlin said, America loves to bomb brown people.

    I think we should do it. Basaad or whatever his name is is getting crazy. He needs a spanking. Only problem being many of his opponents are Al Queda sympathizers. Kind of a win lose situation. Since we (the US) are declining in status around the world, let's show off some of our hardware to keep everyone in check.
    In doing so we would be the Air Force for Al Qaeda....you cool with that?
    Unless there is a strong strategy for the afteremath, I feel too that attacking Syria will only bring a loadshit of new problems rather than solutions.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. September 2013 US & NATO enter Syria=WW3 as Russia resists
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-06-2013, 01:07 PM
  2. Syria Still Photos
    By Youngblood in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-15-2012, 07:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing