Are you for or against intervening in Syria?

[walrus]

Well, like George Carlin said, America loves to bomb brown people.

I think we should do it. Basaad or whatever his name is is getting crazy. He needs a spanking. Only problem being many of his opponents are Al Queda sympathizers. Kind of a win lose situation. Since we (the US) are declining in status around the world, let's show off some of our hardware to keep everyone in check.

In doing so we would be the Air Force for Al Qaeda....you cool with that?

That is why it is a win lose situation as I stated. Still, if we let a country use chemicals against its own people it sets a bad precedent. China and Russia are against any action purely out of financial interest, they couldn't give a shit about human rights.

[VictorCharlie]

Still, if we let a country use chemicals against its own people it sets a bad precedent

The only precedent that should be set is that it is a middle east issue and should be solved by the nations in that region. Or only red line should be when a nation's actions are a threat to US lives or national security. We need to stop being the world police. We aren't that good at it and its a thankless job.

[TitoFan]

Still, if we let a country use chemicals against its own people it sets a bad precedent

The only precedent that should be set is that it is a middle east issue and should be solved by the nations in that region. Or only red line should be when a nation's actions are a threat to US lives or national security. We need to stop being the world police. We aren't that good at it and its a thankless job.

Why Victor....... how mighty "un-Republican" of you.

[walrus]

Still, if we let a country use chemicals against its own people it sets a bad precedent

The only precedent that should be set is that it is a middle east issue and should be solved by the nations in that region. Or only red line should be when a nation's actions are a threat to US lives or national security. We need to stop being the world police. We aren't that good at it and its a thankless job.

Why Victor....... how mighty "un-Republican" of you.

Did you say let the Middle East straighten it out. Was that a joke??

[VictorCharlie]

Did you say let the Middle East straighten it out. Was that a joke??

I don't see how it is any of our concern in the first place but more importantly we haven't exactly done a bang up job in the past. The joke would be this president getting us into a quagmire in the ME just like the last one.

[VictorCharlie]

[VictorCharlie]

Still, if we let a country use chemicals against its own people it sets a bad precedent

The only precedent that should be set is that it is a middle east issue and should be solved by the nations in that region. Or only red line should be when a nation's actions are a threat to US lives or national security. We need to stop being the world police. We aren't that good at it and its a thankless job.

Why Victor....... how mighty "un-Republican" of you.

I vote straight Libertarian and have since 2004. That being said waging war in the middle east has proven to be the one area the Dems and GOP can find some bipartisan harmony. People just like their own war mongerer.

[Freedom]

Still, if we let a country use chemicals against its own people it sets a bad precedent. China and Russia are against any action purely out of financial interest, they couldn't give a shit about human rights.

Did the Obama or Bush administrations ever care about human rights abuses by their allies?

And there is no evidence that the Assad government was responsible for the chemical attack. This has nothing to do with human rights - they just want an excuse to get rid of Assad to further destabilize and weaken Syria.