Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 89

Thread: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2492
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Peter Fury is well fucked off with Haye.

    He used to be a big time gangster. He should get that grinning pixie Booth done in

    A tweet from Peter Fury

    @Ant Pkr this fight is off we even tried sky sports for another replacement but their not interested. Get your money's back.
    That is a stupid thing to say and comments like that can get you in a lot of trouble.
    Idiot

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2049
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    From a promoter's point of view, Fury-Wilder makes little sense right now. Each is still building momentum in what could be stellar careers, on opposite sides of the pond. Each has still to cut their teeth on more credible opposition, although slow progress is being made at each end. Better to gradually improve their opposition, and build up toward a mega HW slugger showdown sometime next year, provided neither of them stumbles, or remains inactive for too long.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    From a promoter's point of view, Fury-Wilder makes little sense right now. Each is still building momentum in what could be stellar careers, on opposite sides of the pond. Each has still to cut their teeth on more credible opposition, although slow progress is being made at each end. Better to gradually improve their opposition, and build up toward a mega HW slugger showdown sometime next year, provided neither of them stumbles, or remains inactive for too long.
    Fury has done more than any other heavy in the world in the last 12 months beating two top heavies.

    Pulev has only fought once looking very mediocre against Thompson and Stiverne has also only had one fight. Haye hasnt fought at all and Wilder has faced 4 opponents but none of them ranked, in fact 2 were retired

    People seem to dismiss what Fury is doing because its Fury but he is legitimately ranked and has done more than most and if Haye hadn't pulled out he'd have done more than everyone

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    924
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    702
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Cunningham and Johnson (Or Maddalone) are top heavies? That doesn't make Fury good, that just proves how shitty this HW era is.

    Again, if Fury has accomplished so much, then why hasn't he fought Thompson, Pulev, or Price?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Fury would destroy Wilder. Too much experience.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Quote Originally Posted by VG_Addict View Post
    Cunningham and Johnson (Or Maddalone) are top heavies? That doesn't make Fury good, that just proves how shitty this HW era is.

    Again, if Fury has accomplished so much, then why hasn't he fought Thompson, Pulev, or Price?
    Thompson was viewed as a soft touch, so much so he was being brought in as a name opponent for someone who hadnt fought above british journeyman level. The fact he beat Price shows how shit Price is and proves people like me right that knew there was a reason the level of opponent was platauing for a reason and that Thompson was a ridiculous jump in class.

    Pulev struggled with Thompson and was made to look mediocre.

    Fury on the other hand had an easier time with Johnson than Vitali did and even Malik Scott has said that when asked how good Fury is (he has sparred afury and admitted Fury burst both his ear drums in sparring).

    Cunningham would be a 220 to 230lb fighter if he carried as much fat as Haye. He is a very skilled fighter and should have been given the decision over Adamek who is ranked by some in the top 5 and battered Arreola.

    Fury is doing the business against those who are willing to fight him. Arreola was one of the names who turned the fight down which is why Fury had to go with Cunningham. Believe what you want but Fury is in the who needs him club. As easy as you lt think he is to beat, no one wants to fight him because he is a nightmare for anyone. He has good stamina and puts more than one or two punches together and can fight inside. Hes still learning, hasnt even fought for a title yet but his progression has been very good. He was put in with the english champion after only 8 months as a pro, some felt he lost and he rematched him and knocked him out. It took Prices team 3 years before they thought their man could be trusted against the same fighter. His progression was glacial for a reason. Price and Haye couldnt not get past their first hurdles.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2492
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by VG_Addict View Post
    Cunningham and Johnson (Or Maddalone) are top heavies? That doesn't make Fury good, that just proves how shitty this HW era is.

    Again, if Fury has accomplished so much, then why hasn't he fought Thompson, Pulev, or Price?
    Thompson was viewed as a soft touch, so much so he was being brought in as a name opponent for someone who hadnt fought above british journeyman level. The fact he beat Price shows how shit Price is and proves people like me right that knew there was a reason the level of opponent was platauing for a reason and that Thompson was a ridiculous jump in class.

    Pulev struggled with Thompson and was made to look mediocre.

    Fury on the other hand had an easier time with Johnson than Vitali did and even Malik Scott has said that when asked how good Fury is (he has sparred afury and admitted Fury burst both his ear drums in sparring).

    Cunningham would be a 220 to 230lb fighter if he carried as much fat as Haye. He is a very skilled fighter and should have been given the decision over Adamek who is ranked by some in the top 5 and battered Arreola.

    Fury is doing the business against those who are willing to fight him. Arreola was one of the names who turned the fight down which is why Fury had to go with Cunningham. Believe what you want but Fury is in the who needs him club. As easy as you lt think he is to beat, no one wants to fight him because he is a nightmare for anyone. He has good stamina and puts more than one or two punches together and can fight inside. Hes still learning, hasnt even fought for a title yet but his progression has been very good. He was put in with the english champion after only 8 months as a pro, some felt he lost and he rematched him and knocked him out. It took Prices team 3 years before they thought their man could be trusted against the same fighter. His progression was glacial for a reason. Price and Haye couldnt not get past their first hurdles.
    For those of you here who know SEANIE , then im afraid to announce he has just lost his title to this guy .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by VG_Addict View Post
    Cunningham and Johnson (Or Maddalone) are top heavies? That doesn't make Fury good, that just proves how shitty this HW era is.

    Again, if Fury has accomplished so much, then why hasn't he fought Thompson, Pulev, or Price?
    Thompson was viewed as a soft touch, so much so he was being brought in as a name opponent for someone who hadnt fought above british journeyman level. The fact he beat Price shows how shit Price is and proves people like me right that knew there was a reason the level of opponent was platauing for a reason and that Thompson was a ridiculous jump in class.

    Pulev struggled with Thompson and was made to look mediocre.

    Fury on the other hand had an easier time with Johnson than Vitali did and even Malik Scott has said that when asked how good Fury is (he has sparred afury and admitted Fury burst both his ear drums in sparring).

    Cunningham would be a 220 to 230lb fighter if he carried as much fat as Haye. He is a very skilled fighter and should have been given the decision over Adamek who is ranked by some in the top 5 and battered Arreola.

    Fury is doing the business against those who are willing to fight him. Arreola was one of the names who turned the fight down which is why Fury had to go with Cunningham. Believe what you want but Fury is in the who needs him club. As easy as you lt think he is to beat, no one wants to fight him because he is a nightmare for anyone. He has good stamina and puts more than one or two punches together and can fight inside. Hes still learning, hasnt even fought for a title yet but his progression has been very good. He was put in with the english champion after only 8 months as a pro, some felt he lost and he rematched him and knocked him out. It took Prices team 3 years before they thought their man could be trusted against the same fighter. His progression was glacial for a reason. Price and Haye couldnt not get past their first hurdles.
    For those of you here who know SEANIE , then im afraid to announce he has just lost his title to this guy .
    Al your just annoyed because you cant refute any of that.

    Fury has earnt his place and has "world" champs like Haye worrying about a cut when its only going to take 2 rounds to dispatch Fury. He wasn't going to even land a shot.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-17-2013, 02:39 PM
  2. Replies: 103
    Last Post: 04-29-2013, 05:08 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-04-2013, 12:39 PM
  4. Wilder & Fury go at it on twitter
    By bzkfn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-20-2013, 01:36 PM
  5. Tyson Fury vs Hasim Rahman on Khan undercard
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 06-13-2011, 09:25 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing