Michael Spinks Vs Michael Moorer at Light Heavyweight

**ykdadamaja** · 09-26-2013 01:47 AM

Originally Posted by bradlee180

Michael Spinks definitely had the power in his left hook to knock over Moorer with that chin of his.

Both 6'2", and both with KO power at Light-Heavy. Moorer with more power, and a devastating short hitter.
Spinks showed a better chin and more versatility, and more consistency.
Moorer ran hot-and-cold.

I'd go with the Olympic Gold Medal winner, Michael Spinks in this one..

Moorer would go into the late rounds and get beat down... Spinks did this time after time after time with guys. Moorer could not handle a young Spinks, and certainly not win on points.

Doesn't matter: 10, 12 or 15 rounder... it would most likely, if a 12 rounder, be stopped- or a real testing time for Moorer- would come in at about the 9th and 11th round.

**p4pking** · 09-26-2013 02:01 AM

I think Moorer would lose via death by misadventure in the 10th round.

**IamInuit** · 09-26-2013 02:12 AM

Originally Posted by p4pking

I think Moorer would lose via death by misadventure in the 10th round.

lo fking l

**Spicoli** · 09-26-2013 02:14 AM

Moorer was raw and still in seek and destroy mode at lt heavy. Decent possiblities with him then vs a Hill, Williams and company but he ain't hanging with a Spinks. Flat footed, arcing hooks often off rock-a-bye footwork that left him square-ish and I think you can sum up how much of a Moorer vs Spinks would look in the 3,4th rounds of his fight with Leslie Stewart.

**Master** · 09-26-2013 06:48 PM

Moorer was a monster puncher at light heavy but you would think Spinks would be too seasoned and experienced to get hit and would probably stop Michael later in the fight. Would have been a great fight to see.