Joe Calzaghe is the 2nd most overrated fighter of all time. Rocky Marciano is no.1

[IamInuit]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

[Mr140]

He has no facts he just hates fighters and kinda goes with it i think. Anyhow Jc is up there he beat good comp was the smw and lhw champ and was champ for 10 years with 20 odd title defenses. As for the Pavlik and Forch wanting to fight him they could not even beat guys he dealt with on the decline.

[nuggetdotcom]

Calzaghe and Marciano share unbeaten records, both were overrated, Marciano, to his credit, fought anyone who was out there, it was just that most of them were 40 years old or more. Calzaghe fought mostly bums, and then old men past their prime. God knows (hopefully) how he got the decision over Hopkins.

If you want to post about unbeaten British fighters then why not Terry Marsh? Or are you a Warren man.

[IamInuit]

Calzaghe and Marciano share unbeaten records, both were overrated, Marciano, to his credit, fought anyone who was out there, it was just that most of them were 40 years old or more. Calzaghe fought mostly bums, and then old men past their prime. God knows (hopefully) how he got the decision over Hopkins.

If you want to post about unbeaten British fighters then why not Terry Marsh? Or are you a Warren man.

Whata crock of shit.

Thee end.

[TitoFan]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.


I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

[IamInuit]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.

I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

I dont care about that stuff man and never said you were trolling. Nor did I say Froch was less likeable or more likeable then Calzaghe. I think they are both a bit on the twat side.

I was asking for facts based on the title of the thread.

[TitoFan]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.

I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

I dont care about that stuff man and never said you were trolling. Nor did I say Froch was less likeable or more likeable then Calzaghe. I think they are both a bit on the twat side.

I was asking for facts based on the title of the thread.

Ok you're missing the boat here... but it's not worth having an argument about it.

The facts I was referring to were the ones responding to the baseless accusations Beanie leveled against me. Then, when I called him on it, he gave me a one-sentence response, obviously clueless about what I had just proven to him.

You're referring to the thread title. One, by the way, that I did not originate.
You want to argue about the thread title..... please argue with the originator.

Thanks,

[IamInuit]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.

I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

I dont care about that stuff man and never said you were trolling. Nor did I say Froch was less likeable or more likeable then Calzaghe. I think they are both a bit on the twat side.

I was asking for facts based on the title of the thread.

Ok you're missing the boat here... but it's not worth having an argument about it.

The facts I was referring to were the ones responding to the baseless accusations Beanie leveled against me. Then, when I called him on it, he gave me a one-sentence response, obviously clueless about what I had just proven to him.

You're referring to the thread title. One, by the way, that I did not originate.
You want to argue about the thread title..... please argue with the originator.

Thanks,

Yeah I suppose I lost the plot. When I asked for facts it was concerning the actual thread title. You thought I meant something else and answered in kind.

I get it now.

[Beanz]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.


I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

It was your thread, you started it and propagated the huge amount of bullshit in it you plum. You were condescending to Iaminuit then, just like you are being now. You spent the whole thread talking Jackson Pollacks after admitting only watching 2 Calzaghe fights. From the off in the first post you moaned like a moaning Minnie about not enjoying watching Calzaghe fight as much as Froch, so it was pretty clear the likeability factor was a red herring. You had nothing to say and spent 16 pages trying to back out of a corner after being owned by a clearly inebriated Fenster. You are a very silly boy.

[TitoFan]

You were condescending to Iaminuit then, just like you are being now.

Stop talking for other people, twerp. Or are you now kissing IamInuit's ass as well?
The Ass-Kissing Grandpa.

You had nothing to say and spent 16 pages trying to back out of a corner after being owned by a clearly inebriated Fenster. You are a very silly boy.

Owned? The only thing Fenster owns is a jiss-covered, full-sized poster of Naseem Hamed..... and he's so butthurt about my ridiculing that he stalks my every post on every thread. Just like you, Ass-Kissing Gramps.

[Beanz]

You were condescending to Iaminuit then, just like you are being now.

Stop talking for other people, twerp. Or are you now kissing IamInuit's ass as well?
The Ass-Kissing Grandpa.

You had nothing to say and spent 16 pages trying to back out of a corner after being owned by a clearly inebriated Fenster. You are a very silly boy.

Owned? The only thing Fenster owns is a jiss-covered, full-sized poster of Naseem Hamed..... and he's so butthurt about my ridiculing that he stalks my every post on every thread. Just like you, Ass-Kissing Gramps.

It's not ass kissing it's called respect. What is it with the Gramps thing ? That's a pretty lame insult. As for the jizz thing and butthurt ? that just undermines any credibility from the rest of your post and confirms that you are a very silly boy.

[TitoFan]

You were condescending to Iaminuit then, just like you are being now.

Stop talking for other people, twerp. Or are you now kissing IamInuit's ass as well?
The Ass-Kissing Grandpa.

You had nothing to say and spent 16 pages trying to back out of a corner after being owned by a clearly inebriated Fenster. You are a very silly boy.

Owned? The only thing Fenster owns is a jiss-covered, full-sized poster of Naseem Hamed..... and he's so butthurt about my ridiculing that he stalks my every post on every thread. Just like you, Ass-Kissing Gramps.

It's not ass kissing it's called respect. What is it with the Gramps thing ? That's a pretty lame insult. As for the jizz thing and butthurt ? that just undermines any credibility from the rest of your post and confirms that you are a very silly boy.

Give it a rest, Beanie. I'm not inclined to continue trading barbs with you.
Aren't there other topics of interest you'd rather discuss? Seriously.

As for Calzaghe... I'm not the one calling him overrated on here. Do you even realize that?

No... I didn't follow him his entire career, but the little I did see, was not to my liking from a fan point of view. His punches were lightly thrown... and his flurries were meant more for show than for damage. Someone mentioned he had brittle hands... and I guess that could do it. Maybe he was the huge puncher way back when... who knows.

But seriously..... take a pill and go back to discussing the ills of the world in the other boards you like so much.

[Beanz]

But seriously..... take a pill and go back to discussing the ills of the world in the other boards you like so much.

These are not posts but threads started in the last few weeks. Step up or STFU

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ous-fight.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...-8-2014-a.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...tzpatrick.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...postponed.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...at-thread.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...at-thread.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...-nov-16-a.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...rted-ways.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ing-video.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...at-thread.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ruit-bowl.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...r-scoring.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...onference.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...g-porkies.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...sage-fury.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...at-thread.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...n-cockell.html


http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...utterbean.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...hat-trick.html

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...rd-debate.html A First I think

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...at-thread.html


Maybe open your eyes and start here

[Fenster]

Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?

What facts would those be my friend?

Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.


I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

It was your thread, you started it and propagated the huge amount of bullshit in it you plum. You were condescending to Iaminuit then, just like you are being now. You spent the whole thread talking Jackson Pollacks after admitting only watching 2 Calzaghe fights. From the off in the first post you moaned like a moaning Minnie about not enjoying watching Calzaghe fight as much as Froch, so it was pretty clear the likeability factor was a red herring. You had nothing to say and spent 16 pages trying to back out of a corner after being owned by a clearly inebriated Fenster. You are a very silly boy.

I am always inebriated. Fact.

[Memphis]

I knew it!