Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    801
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Little child lol, I've probably got tattoos older than you.

    But what's interesting is the rule I once learned during my PC Technology degree , that when someone brings up child sex abuse on a forum, that person is more likely to attempt it.

    Speak volumes about you.
    Then by that rational you're gay


    Your turn princess
    No you misunderstand the logic.

    It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay

    Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.

    NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.

    Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  2. #2
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    No you misunderstand the logic.

    It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay

    Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.

    NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.

    Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
    Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.

    You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    801
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    No you misunderstand the logic.

    It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay

    Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.

    NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.

    Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
    Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.

    You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
    I'm really bored and this is entertaining the shit outta me on what is an otherwise mundane money afternoon.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  4. #4
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    No you misunderstand the logic.

    It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay

    Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.

    NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.

    Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
    Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.

    You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
    I'm really bored and this is entertaining the shit outta me on what is an otherwise mundane money afternoon.
    So arguments are entertaining to you......yeah, that's a little gay at the very least a feminine quality, but hey props to you for being honest and open about it

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    916
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    No you misunderstand the logic.

    It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay

    Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.

    NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.

    Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
    Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.

    You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
    I'm really bored and this is entertaining the shit outta me on what is an otherwise mundane money afternoon.
    So arguments are entertaining to you......yeah, that's a little gay at the very least a feminine quality, but hey props to you for being honest and open about it
    I have to say I am a married heterosexual and I am finding this thread very entertaining. On a serious note a few people here stated Wlad has good footwork. Of course you couldn't tell that from this fight but I have never seen impressive movement from him. Granted, I don't watch a lot of his fights, even when he isn't clinching for 12 rounds I still find him boring.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Wladimir vs Povetkin will be the real "The One"
    By toe2toe in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 10-01-2013, 06:27 PM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-07-2011, 03:23 PM
  3. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 02:34 AM
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 11:33 PM
  5. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-01-2009, 11:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing