So why did Bradley and Jmm not rematch pac?

**FinitoElDinamita** · 10-13-2013 11:57 PM

Originally Posted by jehoshaphat

Bradley actually wanted the Pac rematch and Pac is the one who didn't want it. He and Roach both said everybody knows Pac won comfortably(which he did) and there was no need. And about JMM/Pac 5? When does the series end? What has to happen for it to be over? 3 out of 4 were controversial. Chances are fight 5 has another controversial ending. Fight until they can't make anymore money?

Correct.. pac and roach didnt want it.

**Ron Swanson** · 10-14-2013 05:28 AM

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Originally Posted by jehoshaphat

Bradley actually wanted the Pac rematch and Pac is the one who didn't want it. He and Roach both said everybody knows Pac won comfortably(which he did) and there was no need. And about JMM/Pac 5? When does the series end? What has to happen for it to be over? 3 out of 4 were controversial. Chances are fight 5 has another controversial ending. Fight until they can't make anymore money?

Correct.. pac and roach didnt want it.

One of the most shameful things I've ever seen in this sport is how they said there was no need for a rematch but then were suddenly interested after Bradley was bludgeoned in his win over Provo. You have to take a vicious beating before you get a Pac fight. Rios fits the rule.

Edit-I have to apologize for this post. I was loopy on pain killers but that's no excuse. While I think it's generally true it is very unfair to Pacman as he doesn't pick his fights.