
Originally Posted by
Raeder
There is a message there regarding the former Soviet Union boxers, especially the heaveyweights. What do you think are the tangibles? Is it a myth, or is there something to the mystical strength, tenaciousness and focus which the world saw against Napoleon and Hitler when they got caught in that frozen land, and by those kind of men? What do you think? Are they just hungry? By the way, their opera singers and ballet dancers are tremendous and vastly superior to the West's! To attribute it (i.e., the success) to amateur training vis a vis the American's, or UK's, is too simplistic. What, then, is the success of the Eastern European fighter.
The thread was Eastern European (fighters). As far as bigragu, X and dildo, they often get diaherra of the mouth and become their own worst enema. I did not call anyone "gay." I do not use it unless someone else uses it in particular context, e.g., dildo said,"I'm a bit gay." Now, that means he is a bit "homosexual," a protected species by Saddo. Remember bigragu, your cynicism demonstrates the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Well first off they didn't beat Hitler and Napoleon through the strength of individuals it was rather strength of numbers, I mean they are like ants there are just millions of the fukkers
Secondly I think the fact that they live in a freezing barren icy wasteland makes it rather inhospitable to enemy invaders.
Finally you dare to accuse me of being gay on a previous thread and then start spouting cack about Russia producing great ballet dancers,
You are a focking
Bookmarks