Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Concrete undeniable reason why the K bros. are BOGUS

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Concrete undeniable reason why the K bros. are BOGUS

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    You are backtracking. 'Getting away with it' means you did something wrong, so don't be disingenuous.

    I said from the off that Vitali is a quality boxer, Wlad on the other hand simply isn't. The last Wlad fight, for instance, was something beyond measure. Did you actually see the fight? Did you enjoy it? Was that boxing? 95% of the people who saw it thought it was grotesque.

    He for sure 'got away with it', but most would label it bullshit.
    If the ref isn't calling it a foul........then it isn't a foul
    and since Obama didnt prosecute the wall street insider trading scum, that means they didn't commit any crimes of theft

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Concrete undeniable reason why the K bros. are BOGUS

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    You are backtracking. 'Getting away with it' means you did something wrong, so don't be disingenuous.

    I said from the off that Vitali is a quality boxer, Wlad on the other hand simply isn't. The last Wlad fight, for instance, was something beyond measure. Did you actually see the fight? Did you enjoy it? Was that boxing? 95% of the people who saw it thought it was grotesque.

    He for sure 'got away with it', but most would label it bullshit.
    If the ref isn't calling it a foul........then it isn't a foul
    and since Obama didnt prosecute the wall street insider trading scum, that means they didn't commit any crimes of theft
    Yeah, it's a silly argument. It means basically excusing any level of criminality based on the not being called out or caught argument. I guess that is why Bush Jnr is walking free today and not guilty of any crimes. 'If ya ain't gonna prosecute, then I'm guilty of nothing'. Well, it is one way of looking at things, but it is also absurd.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Undeniable Proof: Bldg 7 & WTC demolition
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-24-2012, 07:59 AM
  2. Bros Icing Bros
    By amat in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-19-2010, 05:03 AM
  3. I LOVE my UK BROS/SIS BUT...................
    By TheBESTP4P in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 153
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 12:00 AM
  4. Concrete or wood?
    By CRO-Luka in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2006, 05:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing