Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcomes?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    I tend to think in both cases that cut/eye closing changed the outcomes of the fights.
    What exactly did you see in that fight that made you think Matthysse would have won?

    I thought Garcia proved that not only could he outbox Matthysse, but he could stand up to his power. Matthysse hit Garcia with some shots that IMO would have knocked out 95% of the JR WW division, but Garcia took them like a champ.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,956
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5111
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    I'd say no in either case but with different aspects to the match and what it was on the bigger landscape. Matthysse v Garcia was two of the very best in division going in and determined a top dog. I think the eye had as much to do with the result as did Matthysse inability to establish a early body attack and being too conservative and Garcia keeping his head seriously level and executing a game plan. The eye was a casualty of conflict and kudos to Garcia for being the source and then exploiting it. But..on a whole I can see a rematch on places in division, name and credential. Aka..moola! Do I need it to be satisfied as a fan? No.

    Of the two I hate Rosados scenario more because NO one wants to see a fight stopped on a cut. But he was brought in to frankly be a showcase and measuring stick, not a top player to Champions. He fought his ass off but I don't buy the inference that he was pulling away or in the verge on an upset. Same with Garcia, Quillin was finding openings as Rosado was getting wider in 8,9 and busted open as he's done in more than a few fights. I don't see a need for a rematch or one being considered. It was a good fight and will serve both but promotion, fighter wise a rematch would in a way be a step sideways for Quillin. Bigger fish to fry and ultimately I don't see the outcome any different. This wasn't a shady cut stoppage and it was as clear as they come. Rosado will again ride it into a decent opponent type fight and payday while Quillin apparently is heading for an explosive GBP special with a Danny Jacobs?!
    Last edited by Spicoli; 10-29-2013 at 09:56 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    716
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    I tend to think in both cases that cut/eye closing changed the outcomes of the fights.
    What exactly did you see in that fight that made you think Matthysse would have won?

    I thought Garcia proved that not only could he outbox Matthysse, but he could stand up to his power. Matthysse hit Garcia with some shots that IMO would have knocked out 95% of the JR WW division, but Garcia took them like a champ.
    He was blind in ine eye from the 4th round yet it was an extremely close fight. Have you ever tried box with one eye blind folded? It's a massive handicap. If Garcia did not score that late KD and everything else went the same there's a good case for Matthysse winning the fight as he was winnin the 11th up til te KD. That would have given a 3 point swing an win him the fight. Garcia clearly won bu there are plenty of reasons for a rematch

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    771
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I've never heard of a rematch because of cuts.
    I could go for a rematch for Rosado, the fight was pretty close and had my full attention, but no rematch because of the cuts.
    Garcia had a good night with a solid win, no rematch.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    671
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    i wouldnt use the word DESERVE because that can get kind of sticky. i think that both of them could rematch and it wouldnt be a bad thing, but saying they deserve a rematch is almost like saying that the winner then owes them a rematch which i dont think is true. both fights were won fairly.

    i think that a garcia/matthysse fight could be great down the road because i believe that both can still win a few more matches and raise their stocks again to make a bigger rematch.

    i dont think that quillin will ever rematch rosado because quillin is on the high road and rosado is just known as a tough fighter. there is really no reason for quillin to give rosado a rematch because the only person it helps is rosado. even if quillin easily beats him in a rematch, i dont think that quillin will all of the sudden be known as a world beater. also, there are definitely bigger money fights out there for him, fights that could push him into a big fight, and fights that could potentially be more exciting. many good fighters over the history of boxing have had tough fights with lesser competition. they usually just move on.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1025
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    The reference is to the come forward hatton style. Both prepared to take a hit to land one. They both share that.

    Either way, garcia came out of that fight without a mark on him and mattyhsssse needs to perhaps have a battle with maidana as garcia is moving on up like M people.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1303
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    I tend to think in both cases that cut/eye closing changed the outcomes of the fights.
    What exactly did you see in that fight that made you think Matthysse would have won?

    I thought Garcia proved that not only could he outbox Matthysse, but he could stand up to his power. Matthysse hit Garcia with some shots that IMO would have knocked out 95% of the JR WW division, but Garcia took them like a champ.
    First, I want to make clear I don't think Garcia is obligated to do a rematch. I also am a big Matthysse fan and have already admitted to sour grapes on this fight. It was a tough fight and Garcia escaped with a win. If he wants to move on to tougher challengers, so be it. There are plenty of good fights for him that don't involve Matthysse including the Broner/Maidana winner, the Thurman/Karass winner, and Brooks. However, those fights are all at 147. At 140, outside of Lundy with the Philly angle, I'm not sure who else there is for Garcia to fight, other than a rematch.

    In my opinion though, the welt grew in the 7th round. Prior to the _th round, I had the fight close. I thought he was getting to Garcia in the later rounds, especially when he knocked Garcia's mouthpiece out of his mouth and Weeks stepped in to get the mouthpiece, giving Matthysse time to recuperate. If he had both eyes, I'm not sure how that round would have ended. I thought I saw both guys make adjustments, but when the eye close, it appeared to me that Matthysse was beginning to adjust, and the closed eye ruined the momentum.

    I also thought Garcia fought dirty. I thought he hit low and frequently held when the fight was in close. He was called for a point in the 11th round, but how many times did Weeks warn him before he took a point? With a different referee and without the closed eye, I think the fight goes differently.

    Does every close fight deserve a rematch? No way. But, fights where there is an argument that the outcome changed due to a cut/closed eye, to me have more grounds for rematches.

    Basically,

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    First, I want to make clear I don't think Garcia is obligated to do a rematch. I also am a big Matthysse fan and have already admitted to sour grapes on this fight. It was a tough fight and Garcia escaped with a win. If he wants to move on to tougher challengers, so be it. There are plenty of good fights for him that don't involve Matthysse including the Broner/Maidana winner, the Thurman/Karass winner, and Brooks. However, those fights are all at 147. At 140, outside of Lundy with the Philly angle, I'm not sure who else there is for Garcia to fight, other than a rematch.

    In my opinion though, the welt grew in the 7th round. Prior to the _th round, I had the fight close. I thought he was getting to Garcia in the later rounds, especially when he knocked Garcia's mouthpiece out of his mouth and Weeks stepped in to get the mouthpiece, giving Matthysse time to recuperate. If he had both eyes, I'm not sure how that round would have ended. I thought I saw both guys make adjustments, but when the eye close, it appeared to me that Matthysse was beginning to adjust, and the closed eye ruined the momentum.

    I also thought Garcia fought dirty. I thought he hit low and frequently held when the fight was in close. He was called for a point in the 11th round, but how many times did Weeks warn him before he took a point? With a different referee and without the closed eye, I think the fight goes differently.

    Does every close fight deserve a rematch? No way. But, fights where there is an argument that the outcome changed due to a cut/closed eye, to me have more grounds for rematches.

    Basically,
    Fair enough. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see it again simply because it has the makings of a great action fight.

    To me though, unless the cut actually stopped the fight (like with Rosado), I don't think it warrants a rematch. There have been other fights (Stiverne/Arreola recently, Pavlik/Martinez is another) where a cut, swelling, broken nose, ect changed the momentum of a fight, but to me that's just boxing. It's up to the fighter to overcome the damage, and if it isn't the doctor stopping the fight and taking that ability away from him, I don't think he has any reason to gripe.

    I really like both guys, and I was one of the many who underestimated Garcia and thought Matthysse would be too much for Garcia. Danny really showed a huge pair of balls and underestimated boxing skill in winning a hard fought victory. I think on that accomplishment, he deserves to propell upwards and enjoy bigger fights.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,970
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    So if they rematch, both of them, and both of them get cuts again, then what would we want?
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    I tend to think in both cases that cut/eye closing changed the outcomes of the fights.
    What exactly did you see in that fight that made you think Matthysse would have won?

    I thought Garcia proved that not only could he outbox Matthysse, but he could stand up to his power. Matthysse hit Garcia with some shots that IMO would have knocked out 95% of the JR WW division, but Garcia took them like a champ.
    First, I want to make clear I don't think Garcia is obligated to do a rematch. I also am a big Matthysse fan and have already admitted to sour grapes on this fight. It was a tough fight and Garcia escaped with a win. If he wants to move on to tougher challengers, so be it. There are plenty of good fights for him that don't involve Matthysse including the Broner/Maidana winner, the Thurman/Karass winner, and Brooks. However, those fights are all at 147. At 140, outside of Lundy with the Philly angle, I'm not sure who else there is for Garcia to fight, other than a rematch.

    In my opinion though, the welt grew in the 7th round. Prior to the _th round, I had the fight close. I thought he was getting to Garcia in the later rounds, especially when he knocked Garcia's mouthpiece out of his mouth and Weeks stepped in to get the mouthpiece, giving Matthysse time to recuperate. If he had both eyes, I'm not sure how that round would have ended. I thought I saw both guys make adjustments, but when the eye close, it appeared to me that Matthysse was beginning to adjust, and the closed eye ruined the momentum.

    I also thought Garcia fought dirty. I thought he hit low and frequently held when the fight was in close. He was called for a point in the 11th round, but how many times did Weeks warn him before he took a point? With a different referee and without the closed eye, I think the fight goes differently.

    Does every close fight deserve a rematch? No way. But, fights where there is an argument that the outcome changed due to a cut/closed eye, to me have more grounds for rematches.

    Basically,
    If the roles were reversed would you want a rematch?

    I had garcias back from day one.

    Everyone was against him and he fought the perfect fight and none of lucas shots had any effect.

    If it means more money in the bank for garcia and the mayweather fight cant be made then yes, close the other eye in the rematch.

    Its onwards and upwards for garcia and im looking foward to seeing his progress without having to go backwards against the argentine hatton.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1173
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    I tend to think in both cases that cut/eye closing changed the outcomes of the fights.
    What exactly did you see in that fight that made you think Matthysse would have won?

    I thought Garcia proved that not only could he outbox Matthysse, but he could stand up to his power. Matthysse hit Garcia with some shots that IMO would have knocked out 95% of the JR WW division, but Garcia took them like a champ.
    First, I want to make clear I don't think Garcia is obligated to do a rematch. I also am a big Matthysse fan and have already admitted to sour grapes on this fight. It was a tough fight and Garcia escaped with a win. If he wants to move on to tougher challengers, so be it. There are plenty of good fights for him that don't involve Matthysse including the Broner/Maidana winner, the Thurman/Karass winner, and Brooks. However, those fights are all at 147. At 140, outside of Lundy with the Philly angle, I'm not sure who else there is for Garcia to fight, other than a rematch.

    In my opinion though, the welt grew in the 7th round. Prior to the _th round, I had the fight close. I thought he was getting to Garcia in the later rounds, especially when he knocked Garcia's mouthpiece out of his mouth and Weeks stepped in to get the mouthpiece, giving Matthysse time to recuperate. If he had both eyes, I'm not sure how that round would have ended. I thought I saw both guys make adjustments, but when the eye close, it appeared to me that Matthysse was beginning to adjust, and the closed eye ruined the momentum.

    I also thought Garcia fought dirty. I thought he hit low and frequently held when the fight was in close. He was called for a point in the 11th round, but how many times did Weeks warn him before he took a point? With a different referee and without the closed eye, I think the fight goes differently.

    Does every close fight deserve a rematch? No way. But, fights where there is an argument that the outcome changed due to a cut/closed eye, to me have more grounds for rematches.

    Basically,
    If the roles were reversed would you want a rematch?

    I had garcias back from day one.

    Everyone was against him and he fought the perfect fight and none of lucas shots had any effect.

    If it means more money in the bank for garcia and the mayweather fight cant be made then yes, close the other eye in the rematch.

    Its onwards and upwards for garcia and im looking foward to seeing his progress without having to go backwards against the argentine hatton.
    I rooted for lucas still do, and will do so again if there is a rematch. Why do people seem opposed to a rematch here? I'm not saying immediatelly but give em a year or two and have them go at it again, was a fun fight and we've seen fights that were far less deservin of rematches get rematched. I know you rooted for danny and He won fair and square but let's not pretend it wasn't a good exciting closeish fight with back and forth action.
    Last edited by armin; 10-30-2013 at 11:46 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    671
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    if garcia wants a rematch with matthysse right now then thats fine, but he wants a fight with mayweather so he wants to go up to 147. im not sure if matthysse has any plan on moving up to 147 in the near future. either way, garcia will prove his worth by beating a legit welterweight. so no, garcia doesnt want a rematch right away because he is on the road to fight mayweather.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1303
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do Matthysse & Rosado Deserve Rematches Due to the Effect the Eye/Cuts on Outcome

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    I tend to think in both cases that cut/eye closing changed the outcomes of the fights.
    What exactly did you see in that fight that made you think Matthysse would have won?

    I thought Garcia proved that not only could he outbox Matthysse, but he could stand up to his power. Matthysse hit Garcia with some shots that IMO would have knocked out 95% of the JR WW division, but Garcia took them like a champ.
    First, I want to make clear I don't think Garcia is obligated to do a rematch. I also am a big Matthysse fan and have already admitted to sour grapes on this fight. It was a tough fight and Garcia escaped with a win. If he wants to move on to tougher challengers, so be it. There are plenty of good fights for him that don't involve Matthysse including the Broner/Maidana winner, the Thurman/Karass winner, and Brooks. However, those fights are all at 147. At 140, outside of Lundy with the Philly angle, I'm not sure who else there is for Garcia to fight, other than a rematch.

    In my opinion though, the welt grew in the 7th round. Prior to the _th round, I had the fight close. I thought he was getting to Garcia in the later rounds, especially when he knocked Garcia's mouthpiece out of his mouth and Weeks stepped in to get the mouthpiece, giving Matthysse time to recuperate. If he had both eyes, I'm not sure how that round would have ended. I thought I saw both guys make adjustments, but when the eye close, it appeared to me that Matthysse was beginning to adjust, and the closed eye ruined the momentum.

    I also thought Garcia fought dirty. I thought he hit low and frequently held when the fight was in close. He was called for a point in the 11th round, but how many times did Weeks warn him before he took a point? With a different referee and without the closed eye, I think the fight goes differently.

    Does every close fight deserve a rematch? No way. But, fights where there is an argument that the outcome changed due to a cut/closed eye, to me have more grounds for rematches.

    Basically,
    If the roles were reversed would you want a rematch?

    I had garcias back from day one.

    Everyone was against him and he fought the perfect fight and none of lucas shots had any effect.

    If it means more money in the bank for garcia and the mayweather fight cant be made then yes, close the other eye in the rematch.

    Its onwards and upwards for garcia and im looking foward to seeing his progress without having to go backwards against the argentine hatton.
    If it were the other way around, I would absolutely want a rematch. As I said before, what's not to like?

    The Argentinian Hatton? That makes no sense, my friend. They fight nothing alike.

    If it is onwards and upwards for Garcia, then fine so be it. If it isn't, then Matthysse is as good, if not better, than any other match out there. If he can get a fight with the Broner/Maidana winner, Thurman/Karass, or Mayweather, I can't blame him.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Haye Valuev two outcomes
    By SEANIE in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-08-2009, 04:18 PM
  2. Pondering 2 Outcomes Of the Cotto Vs Pac Fight
    By JT Rock in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-17-2009, 06:06 AM
  3. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-17-2007, 07:17 AM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-06-2006, 09:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing