Curtis Stevens vs. Peter Quillin?

[Rantcatrat]

Quillin would fuck him up proper. Stevens aint shit

Big Dog, didn't you suggest in a past thread about the GGG-Stevens fight that Stevens had a decent shot against GGG because GGG had no defense? If so, why do you think he has no shot against Quillin? I think he showed some skills against GGG. He isn't in the same class, but he's not bad. Plus, there's the whole Brooklyn thing.

[FinitoElDinamita]

Quillin would fuck him up proper. Stevens aint shit

Big Dog, didn't you suggest in a past thread about the GGG-Stevens fight that Stevens had a decent shot against GGG because GGG had no defense? If so, why do you think he has no shot against Quillin? I think he showed some skills against GGG. He isn't in the same class, but he's not bad. Plus, there's the whole Brooklyn thing.

I did make that statement and Stevens did do better than most people expected..

BUt unlike GGG, QUillin is a rangey fighter and uses distance.. Stevens is so short I have hard time seeing him getting inside within punching range.

People think less of QUillin now because he failed to destroy Rosado but then he could look like a killer against Stevens .. Then some people are going to start questioning why GGG couldnt look as good against a common opponent.

My point is common opponents dont mean anything but I think QUillin would beat Stevens easily.