Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,155
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    They didn't even take his title off him when he tested positive for PEDs and was banned from the sport so why take it off him just because he loses a fight?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,329
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5159
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    Politricks essentially. Peterson is the drunken I forgot her name at 2am but it'll have to do booty call of champions in a weight range filled with many more marketable and appealing contenders and champs. He's just keeping it warm.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Royal Leamington Spa
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    645
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    I agree that it's ridiculous that Peterson still has a belt for more than one reason. He fought Matthyse at a catch-weight, 141!!!, so Matthyse didn't lose the mandatory for Garcia's belt or something, total bullshit. Catch-weights are another trend that is becoming far too prevalent at the mo'..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan-B-Howell View Post
    I agree that it's ridiculous that Peterson still has a belt for more than one reason. He fought Matthyse at a catch-weight, 141!!!, so Matthyse didn't lose the mandatory for Garcia's belt or something, total bullshit. Catch-weights are another trend that is becoming far too prevalent at the mo'..
    Agree and when a catchweight happens for this reason as a fan you almost feel violated. I've always liked the Peterson brothers but he defines paper champion based solely on the Lucas fight.

    As to the steroids well he tested under the allowable limit by the IBF and others for injury rehab and had documentation for the injury and regiment. Not his fault a couple of half wits from his camp neglected to inform those who should have been.

    But that's all academic. Like I said he's a paper champ.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3156
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    I'd argue that this situation shows why catchweights are necessary. A couple of pathetic alphabet outfits, that choose and influence who becomes their "world" champion, nearly prevented a fight between two genuine world-class fighters because of technicalities in their pathetic rules.

    Every hardcore/nerd boxing fan knew Peterson (although a drug cheat) and Matthysse were top of the tree 140 pounders. We didn't need a belt people.

    If the best have to fight the best outside the apparent gospel designated weight limit, so be it.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1391
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    Another blaring example of how meaningless these alphabet soup belts are.

    Yeah, you're world championship has a lot of credibility when your beltholder just got blown out in 3 rounds.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Lamont Peterson still IBF champ?

    Funny thing is everybody knows how ridiculous the entire situation is and nobody does anything about it. This was written on the wall when the Wbc was formed after the split from the Wba and then the Ibf, Wbo and about 10 others today. Add to that the division expansion and the watering down becomes a torrential rain fall. Then catchweights start to creep in drenching the plant even further. 17 divisions turns into who knows how many. Not only do they add catch's they allow them in title fights. Look just throw out the weight classes all together.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. lamont peterson still ibf champ!
    By ruthless rocco in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-14-2012, 01:25 AM
  2. LaMont Peterson..
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-14-2009, 04:18 PM
  3. Any thoughts on Tim Bradley-Lamont Peterson?
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-24-2009, 02:24 PM
  4. How did Lamont Peterson look?
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-26-2009, 05:23 PM
  5. Lamont Peterson
    By getupkid2004 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 12:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing