Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
I dont find it overused at all and when it is used especially by those who have a sense of history its usually spot on.

The Klits would trouble anyone in history. Neither is Primo Carnera and if people think there size gives an advantage today they would be gobsmacked if they had a time machine and took them back in time.
I dont recall anyone using it in a manner that was wrong.

I'll tell you the phrase I'm actually so sick of that indifference has set in.

p4p. Its the most abused, misunderstood, misrepresented, meaningless, overused term in boxing.
From what I've seen on Saddo its mainly used in talking about the Klitschko's because quite often they're bashed and put down in comparison to heavyweights from other eras. Thats an intresting point you make about the phrase pound-for-pound though, I've always thought it was a bit of a buzz word used to market fighters from lighter weight classes, such as 'Floyd or Manny whose being p4p king'. Why do you think its a misunderstood and meaningless term in boxing?