I believe in many and some I have never even heard of from people who have never actually met themI think to say there is only one god strictly is as misguided and shallow as saying there is no one at all.
I believe in many and some I have never even heard of from people who have never actually met themI think to say there is only one god strictly is as misguided and shallow as saying there is no one at all.
Why is it misguided or shallow? Saying one only likes hot chicks is shallow, arguing that God doesn't exist is merely following all the available evidence. How is that misguided or shallow? Only someone who believes in something inherently illogical could suggest such a thing.
More importantly wtf is shallow about only liking hot chicks?
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
But you are arguing that the religious God does not exist or one that models him/it/herself after us. The one in religious text. That is fine but it does not logically follow that therefore there is nothing. Even Einstein said that some day Physics would discover God. So in that sense to dismiss all possibilities is shallow.
I think its said pre determined and over simplified, shallow. Of course we cannot show physical 'proof', as far as I know, that god walks among us. On either side its a belief often turned into a diatribe beating ditractors over the head. Religion, a god, is put into physical form...for some in the form of a friggin super hero...but its misguided to think not seeing means that there is nothing there. Now hot chicks, you know them when you see them, and if they are not around we as men adapt and make sense of the ones available. We are much more flexible with women than we are with religion and more easily excepting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks