Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: flyweight, are you interested?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1363
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: flyweight, are you interested?

    I agree that the smaller a fighter the more technically sound they have to be, but I prefer anywhere between bantam and middleweight to the really light divisions at the same time. I think there is a different type of skill involved when you introduce more raw power, fights become less about output, the element of one punch changing a fight is very exciting to me. Not that it can't happen at flyweight, it's just rare that guys have consistent one punch power there. Even take Ricardo Lopez, who is literally the most masterful boxer I've ever seen, he wouldn't often land hard enough to put guys in trouble with one shot despite doing everything perfectly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    808
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    I agree that the smaller a fighter the more technically sound they have to be, but I prefer anywhere between bantam and middleweight to the really light divisions at the same time. I think there is a different type of skill involved when you introduce more raw power, fights become less about output, the element of one punch changing a fight is very exciting to me. Not that it can't happen at flyweight, it's just rare that guys have consistent one punch power there. Even take Ricardo Lopez, who is literally the most masterful boxer I've ever seen, he wouldn't often land hard enough to put guys in trouble with one shot despite doing everything perfectly.
    Most KOs and TKOs are the result from many punches.
    Have never heard anyone say, "If only it had been a one punch KO, it would have been better."
    I like them too, but you don't see them every card and most of the time there is a jab in there.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: flyweight, are you interested?

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    I agree that the smaller a fighter the more technically sound they have to be, but I prefer anywhere between bantam and middleweight to the really light divisions at the same time. I think there is a different type of skill involved when you introduce more raw power, fights become less about output, the element of one punch changing a fight is very exciting to me. Not that it can't happen at flyweight, it's just rare that guys have consistent one punch power there. Even take Ricardo Lopez, who is literally the most masterful boxer I've ever seen, he wouldn't often land hard enough to put guys in trouble with one shot despite doing everything perfectly.
    Most KOs and TKOs are the result from many punches.
    Have never heard anyone say, "If only it had been a one punch KO, it would have been better."
    I like them too, but you don't see them every card and most of the time there is a jab in there.
    Ali Raymi, a minimum weight just broke the first round knockout record with 20 in a row. Perez could punch at 112 and Wilde was lucky to make 95 pounds fought at fly and put together 100 ko's at times outweighed as much as 30 pounds. I don’t understand the lack of power claims. Weight does not always create power. Power may not be the first thing noticed because their entire game is much more in balance. Higher up you get guys are known for power but in many cases that’s all they got. Nothing to over shadow it or stand out along side it. I'm not a big guy. 5'10 and a buck 70 and God errr evolution blessed me with a solid Celtic chin but I'd wager if that little shrimp Roman Gonzalez nailed me, that I'd wake up on a gurney.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: flyweight, are you interested?

    I watch all weights. I don't care how small muthafukkas are. Boxing is boxing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: flyweight, are you interested?

    Yep, at the end, real boxing fans tune into all fights regardless of division..

    I just can't take female boxing seriously.. Well actually, there was this PPV series called Perfect 10 Model boxing on Showtime around 2005 and it was the shit.. Real hot models would box each other half naked and from what i remember, they werent that bad either.. Tale of the Tape was the best, they'd show their measurements and their favorite sex position and shit like that..

    Anyway, the flyweight division is the deepest division at the moment. If one of the networks or even a small time promoter can put together some kind of tourney, it would be great..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: flyweight, are you interested?

    well i got a lot of love on this thread

    i just started it coz it was bored on a friday afternoon at work, i dont actually believe what i was saying

    and for what its worth womens football looks quite good nowadays
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2340
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: flyweight, are you interested?

    I'm interested in all weights, flyweight has been very good recently & with the addition of Gonzalez it's only going to get better. Lets just hope the top guys continue fighting each other
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who is the greatest flyweight of all time?
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 05-07-2011, 07:43 PM
  2. Replies: 255
    Last Post: 05-12-2010, 11:54 PM
  3. Flyweight eliminator tonight
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-09-2008, 06:04 AM
  4. Best Flyweight in the world
    By The_Mac10 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 03:07 AM
  5. Darchinyan: the next great flyweight?
    By bigragu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-05-2006, 09:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing