Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Are we too quick to call fighters over the hill?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3155
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are we too quick to call fighters over the hill?

    The majority of boxing nerds are like Creationists - their opinion never changes about a fighter regardless of the evidence. All you ever hear in boxing is excuses, excuses, excuses. Every ref and judge and promoter is corrupt - unless their man wins of course, then you don't hear a pin drop.

    Froch is now shit because a young unbeaten fighter stepped up to world-class and passed the test.

    Pac looked like the old Pac which is the same Pac that got ironed out by Marquez. Awesome.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,787
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1448
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are we too quick to call fighters over the hill?

    I think the real problem is that with boxing fans and media the language tends to be to the extreme. It's all or nothing, black or white, the best in the world or over the hill. There's no allowance for the continuum of truth. Just because a fighter is aging doesn't mean it's over - I think both Pac and Mayweather are prime examples of this. Both are slower than they once were, but both are still fast enough to get the job done.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    722
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are we too quick to call fighters over the hill?

    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post
    I think the real problem is that with boxing fans and media the language tends to be to the extreme. It's all or nothing, black or white, the best in the world or over the hill. There's no allowance for the continuum of truth. Just because a fighter is aging doesn't mean it's over - I think both Pac and Mayweather are prime examples of this. Both are slower than they once were, but both are still fast enough to get the job done.

    Preach on!
    People get old, they diminish. Why can't you say they diminish? People take it like you're saying they aren't good, there's too much damn inference. Froch is one of my favorite fighters, even though I think he's a cunt, because he's hard as a coffin nail. But I'm not going to be blind to the fact he is getting old. And acknowledging that fact doesn't mean I think he's crap. But people always infer. I said GGG should try to get a froch fight right now because there are diminishing returns on the value of a win against him. People take that as an insult to Froch. I didn't even say GGG would win but somehow I've insulted Froch. Inference is a dangerous thing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-23-2008, 01:08 PM
  2. Fighters Who Should Call it a Day
    By jmbtandy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-20-2008, 11:57 PM
  3. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-12-2006, 01:49 AM
  4. Hill running
    By gally in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-21-2006, 03:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing