46 Press scores for Froch-Groves - 2 judges way wrong

[Fenster]

Probably the reason he works on the radio then.

At a push an absolute push Froch won 3 rounds.

That proves the point. You accept Froch could have won 3 rounds watching on TV with the influence of camera angles, commentary, punch stats and replays.

The judges and people ringside are watching from a totally different perspective. If rounds can be interpreted different from the TV, where everyone is viewing the same angles, then they can definitely be seen different ringside.

Hence every fucking week people moaning and groaning about fixed judging.

everyone else at ringside agreed with @smashup

dont come with all the persective voodoo shit, the judging was even more shocking than the stoppage

You only have to look at fightscorecollecters site to see virtually every week one or two journalists score totally different to the majority.

If an impartial ringside observer, that has years of experience in boxing, can get the same score as the judges then it's possible. That's all i'm saying.

(And all you conspiracy cunts need a good hiding)

[erics44]

Probably the reason he works on the radio then.

At a push an absolute push Froch won 3 rounds.

That proves the point. You accept Froch could have won 3 rounds watching on TV with the influence of camera angles, commentary, punch stats and replays.

The judges and people ringside are watching from a totally different perspective. If rounds can be interpreted different from the TV, where everyone is viewing the same angles, then they can definitely be seen different ringside.

Hence every fucking week people moaning and groaning about fixed judging.

everyone else at ringside agreed with @smashup

dont come with all the persective voodoo shit, the judging was even more shocking than the stoppage

You only have to look at fightscorecollecters site to see virtually every week one or two journalists score totally different to the majority.

If an impartial ringside observer, that has years of experience in boxing, can get the same score as the judges then it's possible. That's all i'm saying.

(And all you conspiracy cunts need a good hiding)

one or two journalists isn't the two judges at ringside

the fight wasn't an even fight theres no doubt about that

[Fenster]

Probably the reason he works on the radio then.

At a push an absolute push Froch won 3 rounds.

That proves the point. You accept Froch could have won 3 rounds watching on TV with the influence of camera angles, commentary, punch stats and replays.

The judges and people ringside are watching from a totally different perspective. If rounds can be interpreted different from the TV, where everyone is viewing the same angles, then they can definitely be seen different ringside.

Hence every fucking week people moaning and groaning about fixed judging.

everyone else at ringside agreed with @smashup

dont come with all the persective voodoo shit, the judging was even more shocking than the stoppage

You only have to look at fightscorecollecters site to see virtually every week one or two journalists score totally different to the majority.

If an impartial ringside observer, that has years of experience in boxing, can get the same score as the judges then it's possible. That's all i'm saying.

(And all you conspiracy cunts need a good hiding)

one or two journalists isn't the two judges at ringside

the fight wasn't an even fight theres no doubt about that

You think Froch beat Kessler the first time which is a minority position. That means you were scoring rounds for Froch that the majority were scoring for Kessler. Why is that?

Either you're corrupt, incompetent or was possibly seeing some rounds different to the majority?