Id love to hear Howards thoughts on Froch v Groves and everything you have listed that seems very dodgy ;-)
And lets not fuck around here , in the UK alone there have been shockers lately ... one after another.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Id love to hear Howards thoughts on Froch v Groves and everything you have listed that seems very dodgy ;-)
And lets not fuck around here , in the UK alone there have been shockers lately ... one after another.
Array
The rationale that we got from Foster and the head guy from the BBBC was that it's better that Groves took one punch too few than one punch too many. So how come that didn't apply a few weeks ago during Cleverly versus Kovalev when the ref carried Cleverley back to his own corner?
The worst thing was that if Groves had made it through to the end he would have been robbed on the cards anyway.
Array
Kovalev should have been disqualified against Cleverly for whacking him twice when he was on the deck. Joe Cortez wouldn't have stood for that. Ask Humberto Soto.
Bellew didn't get a gift against Chilemba. Burns-Beltran was about judges. Shock! The nine count was explained by the BBBofC rules.
When exactly did boxing not have controversy every single week? Before we couldn't witness virtually every fight this stuff only happened in Germany (). You need a knockout to get a draw in Italy.
![]()
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks