WBC tourney if vitali retires

[IamInuit]

Why not have all the belts unified? I mean that's one (of the many ) things posters always complain about. Put Wlad in the tournament or just have him fight the winner of the tournament.

Two words. Jose Sulaiman. They guy has nightmares over an undisputed champion or even the unification of two with few exceptions. Its part of his admitted mandate not to share his champion with another tin pot. He will ensure this by excluding Wlad in any tourney for his belt.

There is a real chance at an undisputed champion at 175 also but I'd wager he sticks his paws into that also at some point.

[boyla]

Four man tournament would be the only way to legitamise having a WBC belt.
8 man would be to difficult to organise.

Stiverne will keep twiddling his thumbs until Vitali officially retires, which might not be until September, is there fan pressure to strip Vitali, so Stiverne can have a match vs Wilder to become Champion.
Not so much considering Wilder's lack of opposition.
Stiverne's rightful stubbornness to not fight until he gets his mandatory does not do him any favours.

[Master]

I think if Fury can get his head back and focus he could win and hold the belt, but I have a feeling the Haye fiasco may have messed with his head and he may have regressed backwards.

[Max Power]

I am thinking Arreola or Stiverne. Proven fighters.

[El Kabong]

I am thinking Arreola or Stiverne. Proven fighters.

I think a rematch between those two would be good.

[Silkeyjoe]

I am thinking Arreola or Stiverne. Proven fighters.

How is Arreola a prove fighter? While guys like Ali, Fraizer and Foreman were bums?

[Master]

I am thinking Arreola or Stiverne. Proven fighters.

How is Arreola a prove fighter? While guys like Ali, Fraizer and Foreman were bums?

Because they are modern heavyweights and have the size and weight and the latest technological advances.