Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Black and white boxing era

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Black and white boxing era

    This is starting to crack me up. I have been trying so hard to not get into this eternal debate that in the end never really solves anything. To a certain segment of society if you can’t find it on youtube or a film then it didn't happen or it’s extremely exaggerated. Does anyone with even an iota of boxing history/human history on their belt realize what you are dismissing using the premise that there is no footage? Specifically with boxing you are dismissing quite literally at least a hundred great boxers going back as far as George Dixon and beyond. On practically every top ten atg list you will find fighters with little or no footage. Robinson has topped the 147 list for ever and there is maybe one fight floating around of his time spent there and its crap. Much of the footage available is shit to say the least.

    Just sit back for a second and think of the fighters one tosses out because of a lack of footage. Then think how much history in general that we could dismiss because of a lack of footage? It is by that blood and those events that we now have all of this gadgetry. We could I suppose dismiss all of history prior to the advent of all of these devices.

    In the end I don’t need a chunk of film to tell me who Greb was. I bring Greb up because for some reason he is singled out. And singled out ironically because of his dominance. I can read the history of the man in books and by alternate sources using testimony by those who were there and respected historians that have followed him and others through their time. In many ways, the written word is as important as any tape. There are quite literally hundreds of great fighters with no film attached. Somehow this makes them less great? And this is a sound argument how? How much of human history is accepted by word alone? The medium of film has been a short one compared to our shared human history w/o it. And ftr they did film some of Grebs fights. Tunney 1, Walker and Flowers but they were filmed using a nitrate base which only has about a 50 year lifespan.

    Harry Greb was a marvel and would have wiped the floor with any middleweight fighting today including that Russian Godlike character that the rest of the world ducks. Speaking of ducks, this shit never played out in the fashion it does today. Today, a time when the chances on getting an undisputed champion is slim to none and slim left the party. Either Greb was as good as all his contemporaries say along with historians, broadcasters and onlookers or they are all liars based solely on the fact that there is no film. Seems a fickle stance and better suited for a first year philosophy course and the study of skepticism.

    Harry Greb fought over 300 times. 299 at boxrec and only lost 8 times including only one legit stoppage. He fought from welter to heavy and was the only man to beat Tunney, arguably twice. He fought heavyweight contenders and 45 times in one year but of course the skeptics merely suggest they were scrubs and cab drivers. He fought and beat 18 Hall of famers, 7 light-heavyweight champions and fought blind in one eye about the last 3 years of his career. If this isn’t great then I don’t know what is. Those who love this Nanny state of boxing will simply reply “he was great for his time” Bullshit. He would have been great at any time. My lord both Moyer brothers would be world champions with ease today and animals like Stanley Ketchel probably would not be able to get a fight.

    If anything guys like Greb, Gans, Langford and countless others don’t get their due respect based solely on this lack of footage. That is pretty evident. Perhaps the Roman Empire was an elaborate hoax. And later, people such as Da Vinci and Galileo are all made up characters. I've seen no film footage. All nursery rhymes and really no different then the stories of religion. The boxing establishment was steered away from Burley and the rest of Murderers row because they were that good. It took Moore 160 fights to even get a title shot and he's the only one that made it out with any degree of success. You can’t capture that fact on film.

    It’s funny because you see the phrase “rose coloured glasses” being tossed around and if anyone is wearing them its those who believe that boxing began in 1990.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    658
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Black and white boxing era

    The main point I got in your post Inuit, is that everybody elevates and appraises these way in the past greats without EVER even seeing them fight! And you think this is right.



    Nobody ever said it should be dismissed, history is history and it's what enables those that come after to build from it.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Black and white boxing era

    I agree with those who say the black and white era are overrated.. personally they are boring to me..

    I think 70s-early 90s fighters were the most skilled, had competitive matchups, and were most exciting.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    658
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Black and white boxing era

    The post above I can identify with. Although I have mocked 70's boxers considerably I think the greats from that era were definitely better than those before. I don't think Louis or Marciano would be able to beat the fully developed and stronger 70's Ali (although they might have out-bulled the lighter 60's one) and I'm pretty sure Foreman would have knocked out any man who came before him (And I do mean ANY).

    And I also feel that Mike Tyson and the 90's HW scene and the early 2000's were the real Golden Age of Heavyweight boxing.

    I can't watch the B&W era for any reasons apart from research.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1069
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Black and white boxing era

    Quote Originally Posted by kleit View Post
    haha
    This guy

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1335
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Black and white boxing era

    Hey @jabvargas24

    Check out this video from 1945 of Willie Pep, one of the greats. Look at how much style he had in the ring.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,156
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1408
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Hey @jabvargas24

    Check out this video from 1945 of Willie Pep, one of the greats. Look at how much style he had in the ring.

    Great elusive defence not just because of clever neat feet but lateral movement constantly changing angles and brilliant anticipation. That ability to read the other fighter meant that he was also fantastic at walking his opponent onto shots (often short sharp hooks) like a freshwater fisherman who has grown up with the perch that he is trapping. You know their habits by always watching and learning and you start to predict the lines they move in. Great technician and artist.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. When Black vs. White Equaled Green.
    By holmcall in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-23-2010, 02:52 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-28-2008, 03:42 PM
  3. White Collar Boxing in the Midlands.
    By ExecutiveBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-04-2008, 03:56 AM
  4. Yet another black eye for boxing
    By Bx730NY in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-13-2007, 11:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing