Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Boxrec

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    808
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    I would be surprised if there weren't a few mistakes scattered throughout Boxrec.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1009
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    Plenty. Boxing history is so extensive and goes back so far, it's gonna be incomplete...

    fightfax is boxing's official records keeper. I think that one's a pay site though.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    834
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    They do a great job at BoxRec. The people who add the data are volunteers, they don't get paid for it. We should be grateful to them.

    We shouldn't expect them to be perfect. Much of the information is what's been given to them by managers/promoters and when something changes, those sources are sometimes slow to notify BoxRec.

    I've found the information is mostly accurate and generally reliable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,300
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5153
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    Its ok. A reference point for dates and names but like anything it's not to be taken at face value. I think of it like the old telephone books...name-date-location but until you make the call, or see the fight...you just don't get the full picture. I like they keep full record of judges, but with add ons and 'volunteers' it feels like Wikipedia in spots.

    On Spain, Boxrec may shoot itself in the foot...he is listed as 2-23-1 but his initial bout is noted as 'first in three years'... Why provide 'info' if you cannot support it and show a previous, which by its own count doesn't exist..unless I'm missing something?!

    And what was Tyson doing fighting a lt heavyweight

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1009
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    Fellas, fellas, there's over 20 thousand pro Boxing bouts per year in recent years, God knows how many amateur bouts, but it's sure to be more than pro bouts. It's a world sport, there's about 195 countries in the world. It'd be extremely difficult to track and record the stats for all. And records from 50 years ago or more may be difficult if not impossible to get them all listed, especially before 1920 when it was an outlaw sport, or in the no-contest/newspaper decision era. Boxrec is good, stop being b!t<hes...

    EDIT:
    As for Spain, Boxrec says he had 1 bout when he fought Tyson who only had 3. Obviously it was a soft touch handpicked to build fighter confidence in Tyson and make him look good in his 1st televised appearance. Showcase fight.
    Last edited by bradlee180; 12-11-2013 at 07:52 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1443
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    Promoters used to beef up an unknown's record to make him sound better on paper than the tomato can he actually was so that a network would buy him as a viable opponent to their cash cow prospect. On this occasion, I'd trust boxrec.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec

    They are not to bad but they are way off for lots of fighters pre say 1950. They are inconsistent. They get Wickwar right and George Dixon wrong.

    I use CBZ much more then Boxrec.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Boxrec
    By DAWGSWIN in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-03-2012, 03:40 AM
  2. BoxRec is no more :(
    By Kel in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-19-2010, 12:01 AM
  3. Boxrec .......
    By hitmanhatton in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2009, 04:21 PM
  4. I know, I know, it's boxrec, but.....................
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-14-2006, 11:00 PM
  5. Either than boxrec
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-07-2006, 12:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing