Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
Geale is quite a bit better than Kirkland, but neither would have much of a chance against Golovkin imo. People often say "it will be fireworks while it lasts", to describe a mismatch between two action fighters. Would it really be that riveting to see Golovkin beat the hell out of Kirkland just because both have aggressive styles? They are a completely different level of fighter, and I don't think Kirkland has ever fought at 160 to boot.
Kirkland wouldn't take a backwards step and would land a few heavy shots I think. But his aggression would no doubt be his demise as well and he would walk onto shots. But it would be good whilst it lasted.